From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next,RFC 08/10] netfilter: move NF_QUEUE handling away from core
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:09:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161013150946.GA20580@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161013150423.GB1301@salvia>
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > Any reason why this is needed?
> > AFAICS xt_NFQUEUE will never return NF_QUEUE after this patch.
>
> -j QUEUE uses the standard target to return NF_QUEUE. This is very
> primitive way to queue packets to userspace queue 0 via nf_queue, but
> still may break. I can place this under unlikely() as these days
> people should be using NFQUEUE instead.
No need, just add a comment that this handles legacy standard target
QUEUE (i forgot we still have this).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-13 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-13 12:02 [PATCH nf-next,RFC 00/10] Netfilter core updates Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 01/10] netfilter: get rid of useless debugging from core Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 02/10] netfilter: remove comments that predate rcu days Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 03/10] netfilter: bridge: kill NF_HOOK_THRESH() and state->tresh Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:25 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-13 15:01 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 15:10 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-13 15:21 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 15:25 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 04/10] netfilter: deprecate NF_STOP Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 05/10] netfilter: x_tables: move hook state into xt_action_param structure Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 06/10] netfilter: nf_tables: use hook state from " Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 07/10] netfilter: use switch() to handle verdict cases from nf_hook_slow() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 08/10] netfilter: move NF_QUEUE handling away from core Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:38 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-13 15:04 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 15:09 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2016-10-14 8:06 ` Liping Zhang
2016-10-14 9:53 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-14 10:28 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-14 15:38 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-14 16:47 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-14 17:22 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 09/10] netfilter: merge nf_iterate() into nf_hook_slow() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 10/10] netfilter: inline nf_hook_slow() and rename it to nf_hook_iterate() Pablo Neira Ayuso
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-13 12:11 [PATCH nf-next,RFC 00/10] Netfilter core updates Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:12 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 08/10] netfilter: move NF_QUEUE handling away from core Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161013150946.GA20580@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.