diff for duplicates of <20161014140836.GA10917@kroah.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index ebdaa88..e5b6fff 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -4,10 +4,10 @@ On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 03:40:22PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > It took me quite some time to get v4.4.24 to successfully boot (this > was a 32 bits build on Fedora 24). Especially annoying was that it > failed silently on real hardware. Only after messing around with Qemu -> it became clear what might be going on. +> it became clear what might be going on.� > > It turned out Fedora 24 ships binutils-2.26, and using that version of -> binutils apparently requires commit 6d92bc9d483a ("x86/build: Build +> binutils apparently requires commit�6d92bc9d483a ("x86/build: Build > compressed x86 kernels as PIE"). Does is makes sense to add that commit > to the v4.4.y stable tree? diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 0870095..ed61a98 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -14,10 +14,10 @@ "> It took me quite some time to get v4.4.24 to successfully boot (this\n" "> was a 32 bits build on Fedora 24). Especially annoying was that it\n" "> failed silently on real hardware. Only after messing around with Qemu\n" - "> it became clear what might be going on.\302\240\n" + "> it became clear what might be going on.\303\257\302\277\302\275\n" "> \n" "> It turned out Fedora 24 ships binutils-2.26, and using that version of\n" - "> binutils apparently requires commit\302\2406d92bc9d483a (\"x86/build: Build\n" + "> binutils apparently requires commit\303\257\302\277\302\2756d92bc9d483a (\"x86/build: Build\n" "> compressed x86 kernels as PIE\"). Does is makes sense to add that commit\n" "> to the v4.4.y stable tree?\n" "\n" @@ -30,4 +30,4 @@ "\n" greg k-h -aa60bbacb2ae05235ed0b5a91f09afdd04b7c77d4a8def24c1b376f8e287e364 +b3ef8b8466e112417f93a47a2781321c59500431302dad0d3e375219591b16bb
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.