All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Eugene Surovegin <surovegin@google.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] kprobes: unpoison stack in jprobe_return() for KASAN
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 09:01:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161016070130.GA2569@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+apm9_d3xsB2_fQYqr-gzL9zjwFkiPzXDZ4y9nio82+TQ@mail.gmail.com>


* Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
> >
> >> KASAN stack instrumentation poisons stack redzones on function entry
> >> and unpoisons them on function exit. If a function exits abnormally
> >> (e.g. with a longjmp like jprobe_return()), stack redzones are left
> >> poisoned. Later this leads to random KASAN false reports.
> >>
> >> Unpoison stack redzones in the frames we are going to jump over
> >> before doing actual longjmp in jprobe_return().
> >
> > Does this affect any other architecture besides arm64? If not then it might make
> > the most sense to merge this via the arm64 tree.
> 
> 
> This is mostly for x86_64. This patch fixes KASAN false positives
> related to jprobe on x86_64.

Indeed: I should have read the patch beyond the diffstat.

> Arm64 related part is only a function rename. As I introduce a
> function similar to an existing one, Mark asked to me rename the
> existing function to clarify the difference between the two.

Fair enough!

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-16  7:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-14 14:07 [PATCH v5] kprobes: unpoison stack in jprobe_return() for KASAN Dmitry Vyukov
2016-10-15  6:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-10-15  8:00   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-10-16  7:01     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-10-16 11:19 ` [tip:perf/urgent] kprobes: Unpoison " tip-bot for Dmitry Vyukov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161016070130.GA2569@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    --cc=surovegin@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.