Re: [PATCH rdma-core 4/4] glue/redhat/spec: build split rpm packages

[Jarod Wilson <jarod-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 05:39:04PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 03:21:36PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> 
> > Wrote: /home/jwilson/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/iwpmd-11-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> 
> FC used to call this libiwpm for some reason..

Ah. I may need to add an Obsoletes: for that particular case then.

> > Wrote: /home/jwilson/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libibcm-11-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> 
> Do you want to try and do as I did with debian and put the SONAME data
> into the package version for the libraries? eg
> 
> libibcm1_1.0.11-1_amd64.deb

No, that's a debian-ism that Red Hat has never really followed. The soname
data is already captured in the rpm metadata.

> > Wrote: /home/jwilson/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libcxgb3-11-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > Wrote: /home/jwilson/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libcxgb4-11-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > Wrote: /home/jwilson/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libhfi1-11-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > Wrote: /home/jwilson/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libi40iw-11-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > Wrote: /home/jwilson/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libipathverbs-11-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > Wrote: /home/jwilson/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libmlx4-11-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > Wrote: /home/jwilson/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libmlx5-11-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > Wrote: /home/jwilson/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libmthca-11-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > Wrote: /home/jwilson/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libnes-11-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > Wrote: /home/jwilson/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libocrdma-11-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > Wrote: /home/jwilson/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/librxe-11-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> 
> Does this mean RH is not going to do a single package for the
> providers? You know another 5 or so are coming..

Putting all the providers in a single sub-package is certainly something
we could do. With rpm virtual Provides and Obsoletes, we could make the
upgrade path transparent to at least yum/dnf/rpm, but it might still
confuse people who go looking for the same package they've always had
installed, so it could be something we do in Fedora and the next RHEL
major release, rather than in a current RHEL minor update.

> Any feedback if things build on your supported arches? I'd be
> interested to see compiler log if it isn't silent.
> 
> > +install -D -m0644 Documentation/{ibacm,ibsrpdm,libibcm,libibverbs,librdmacm,rxe}.md %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/
> > +install -D -m0644 README.md %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/
> 
> I guess README should go in that patch I sent you..

D'oh, yeah, I'll mix that in here locally.

> > +%{buildroot}/%{_bindir}/ib_acme -D . -O
> > +# Fixup a multilib conflict in ibacm_opts.cfg:
> > +sed -i -e '/^# Specifies the directory of the provider libraries$/ a\
> > +# Use /usr/lib64/ibacm on 64bit, /usr/lib/libacm on 32bit.
> > +' -e 's%^\(# provider_lib_path
> > /usr/\)lib\(64\)\?/ibacm$%\1lib64/ibacm%' ibacm_opts.cfg
> 
> Hum? I'm pretty sure this is basically fixed in the code now, was done here
> 5eebdb9baaaae420a4bb16e586a96807823916a0
> 
> Adjusting the comment like that doesn't really make sense, the acm
> daemon has a fixed endianness and looks in a single place to load the
> plugin. If someone wants to use 32 bit plugins they have to install
> the 32 bit acm daemon, which would have the 32 bit path in the sample
> conf file...

This was just copy and paste from our existing libacm spec, might well be
something that was fixed and I just missed it.

> > +install -D -m0644 ibacm/man/*.1 %{buildroot}/%{_mandir}/man1/
> > +install -D -m0644 ibacm/man/*.7 %{buildroot}/%{_mandir}/man7/
> > +sed -e 's|@ACM_PROVIDER_DIR@|%{libdir}/%{name}/|g' -e 's|@CMAKE_INSTALL_FULL_LOCALSTATEDIR@|%{_localstatedir}|g' ibacm/man/ibacm_prov.7.in > %{buildroot}/%{_mandir}/man7/ibacm_prov.7
> 
> ?? cmake is supposed to install these.. Looks like it works. What did
> you need done here to open code it?

They weren't getting installed, so I threw that hack in, meant to
actually say something about that, got lost in the shuffle. I'll
double-check if they're still not getting installed... Okay, they're
getting installed now. May have just been a transient error with an
earlier tarball, or something else I did wrong. I'll drop that bit.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jarod-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html