From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Do not decay new task load on first enqueue
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:29:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161018102937.GI16071@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161011102453.GA16071@codeblueprint.co.uk>
On Tue, 11 Oct, at 11:24:53AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> That's a lot more costly cross-DIE migrations. I think this patch is
> along the right lines, but there's something fishy happening on this
> box.
I wasn't really able to track down why this machine regressed, and the
patch shows enough improvement for other boxes that I think it's worth
sticking in tip/sched/core.
I saw a number of double digit gains for hackbench with this patch.
Here's a 4-cpu box that shows improvements in arithmetic mean and some
nice improvements to the stddev,
hackbench-process-pipes
4.8.0 4.8.0
vanilla find-idle-group-v1r1
Amean 1 3.2580 ( 0.00%) 3.0607 ( 6.06%)
Amean 3 8.0387 ( 0.00%) 8.2027 ( -2.04%)
Amean 5 12.0507 ( 0.00%) 12.1703 ( -0.99%)
Amean 7 16.0027 ( 0.00%) 16.4567 ( -2.84%)
Amean 12 26.9030 ( 0.00%) 21.7767 ( 19.05%)
Amean 16 33.4127 ( 0.00%) 28.9877 ( 13.24%)
Stddev 1 0.1383 ( 0.00%) 0.1787 (-29.22%)
Stddev 3 0.1297 ( 0.00%) 0.1677 (-29.29%)
Stddev 5 0.5495 ( 0.00%) 0.4549 ( 17.22%)
Stddev 7 0.7401 ( 0.00%) 0.6161 ( 16.75%)
Stddev 12 2.3187 ( 0.00%) 0.7102 ( 69.37%)
Stddev 16 4.0734 ( 0.00%) 2.9364 ( 27.91%)
And a 60-cpu box with similar improvements,
hackbench-process-sockets
4.8.0 4.8.0
vanilla find-idle-group-v1r1
Amean 1 32.8810 ( 0.00%) 2.0590 ( 93.74%)
Amean 4 34.8663 ( 0.00%) 3.3177 ( 90.48%)
Amean 7 34.1243 ( 0.00%) 4.3323 ( 87.30%)
Amean 12 36.8373 ( 0.00%) 5.3650 ( 85.44%)
Amean 21 29.0333 ( 0.00%) 6.0280 ( 79.24%)
Amean 30 27.2807 ( 0.00%) 7.2653 ( 73.37%)
Amean 48 23.2453 ( 0.00%) 9.9810 ( 57.06%)
Amean 79 29.6660 ( 0.00%) 16.6680 ( 43.81%)
Amean 110 41.3680 ( 0.00%) 23.1787 ( 43.97%)
Amean 141 45.3720 ( 0.00%) 29.4130 ( 35.17%)
Amean 172 45.6403 ( 0.00%) 34.3783 ( 24.68%)
Amean 203 47.6120 ( 0.00%) 40.0063 ( 15.97%)
Amean 234 50.1703 ( 0.00%) 43.4503 ( 13.39%)
Amean 240 50.1110 ( 0.00%) 44.4660 ( 11.26%)
Stddev 1 0.9714 ( 0.00%) 0.6617 ( 31.88%)
Stddev 4 0.4459 ( 0.00%) 0.2943 ( 34.01%)
Stddev 7 0.3091 ( 0.00%) 0.2722 ( 11.94%)
Stddev 12 0.4603 ( 0.00%) 0.1424 ( 69.05%)
Stddev 21 1.3647 ( 0.00%) 0.1566 ( 88.52%)
Stddev 30 4.1277 ( 0.00%) 0.0481 ( 98.84%)
Stddev 48 1.3689 ( 0.00%) 0.4968 ( 63.71%)
Stddev 79 2.0772 ( 0.00%) 0.5309 ( 74.44%)
Stddev 110 4.5655 ( 0.00%) 0.1846 ( 95.96%)
Stddev 141 4.2637 ( 0.00%) 0.6675 ( 84.34%)
Stddev 172 1.5741 ( 0.00%) 1.0242 ( 34.93%)
Stddev 203 1.0973 ( 0.00%) 1.4043 (-27.98%)
Stddev 234 2.2048 ( 0.00%) 0.8709 ( 60.50%)
Stddev 240 1.2849 ( 0.00%) 0.2688 ( 79.08%)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-18 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-23 11:58 [PATCH] sched/fair: Do not decay new task load on first enqueue Matt Fleming
2016-09-23 14:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-09-27 13:48 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-09-27 19:24 ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-27 19:21 ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-28 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-28 11:06 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-09-28 11:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-28 11:31 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-09-28 11:46 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-09-28 12:00 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-04 21:25 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-04 20:16 ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-28 12:27 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-09-28 13:13 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-09-29 16:15 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-10-03 13:05 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-09-28 17:59 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-09-28 19:37 ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-30 20:30 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-09 3:39 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-10-10 10:01 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-10 10:09 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-10-11 10:27 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-10 12:29 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-10 13:54 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-10-10 18:29 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-11 9:44 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-10-11 10:39 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-18 10:11 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-10 17:34 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-11 10:24 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-11 13:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-11 18:57 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-12 7:41 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-18 11:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-18 15:19 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-18 10:29 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2016-10-18 11:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-18 11:29 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-18 12:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-19 6:38 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-19 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-09 16:53 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-04 20:11 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-09 5:57 ` [sched/fair] f54c5d4e28: hackbench.throughput 10.6% improvement kernel test robot
2016-10-09 5:57 ` [lkp] " kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161018102937.GI16071@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--to=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=yuyang.du@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.