From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
Cc: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>, WeiLiu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: Regression between Xen 4.6.0 and 4.7.0, Direct kernel boot on a qemu-xen and seabios HVM guest doesn't work anymore.
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 13:48:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161018124823.GM23219@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <365154539.20161017172817@eikelenboom.it>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:28:17PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Thursday, October 13, 2016, 4:43:31 PM, you wrote:
>
> > Hi Jan / Wei,
>
> > Took a while before i had the chance to fiddle some more to find the actual culprit.
> > After analyzing the output of xl -vvvvv create somewhat more i came to the
> > insight it was probably Qemu and not Xen causing the fault.
>
> > As a test I just used a qemu-xen binary build with xen-4.6.0 booting up a guest with
> > direct kernel boot mode on xen-unstable. And that old qemu binary works fine.
>
> > After testing i can conclude, Jan was right, the bisection was a red herring,
> > the problem is caused by some change in Qemu and not by something in the Xen tree.
> > (strange thing is that for as far as i know i did a "make distclean" between
> > every build (taking a lot of time), which should have pulled a fresh qemu-xen
> > tree and therefor the bisection should have lead to a commit with a Config.mk
> > hash change for qemu-xen version.)
>
> > Will see if i can find some more time and bisect qemu and find the culprit.
>
> > --
> > Sander
>
>
> Unfortunately i have to give up on this issue, for me it's impossible to bisect this
> issue with my present git-foo.
>
> The first try with bisection of the whole xen-tree seems to have hit the issue that the
> qemu-revision that gets pulled on a fresh build is "master" during the whole
> dev period. That creates havoc when trying to bisect, since you are testing
> combinations that were never developed (nor auto tested) in that combination
> (especially when a xen-tree and qemu-tree change have a dependency like Roger's
> "xen: fix usage of xc_domain_create in domain builder")
>
> While trying to bisect only qemu (keeping xen itself on RELEASE-4.6.0 and
> seabios on rel-1.8.2) it get stuck on issues with that tree.
> Between 4.6.0 and 4.7.0 the qemu tree switched from git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-upstream-4.6-testing.git
> to git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git),after that there seem to have
> been a lot of merges going back and forth and to me it seems a mess (but as i
> said it could also be a lack of git-foo). I tried by manual bisecting, removing
> and cloning trees again etc. but that doesn't suffice, it's all going no-where.
> (while the known good build (plain RELEASE-4.6.0) always works, so it doesn't
> seem to be some random problem)
>
Thanks for trying.
> So perhaps some dev can at least verify that the issue is there (since 4.7.0)
> and put it on the "known broken" list of things.
>
I will put this into the list of things I need to look at.
Wei.
> --
> Sander
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-18 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-25 20:21 Regression between Xen 4.6.0 and 4.7.0, Direct kernel boot on a qemu-xen and seabios HVM guest doesn't work anymore linux
2016-08-25 20:34 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-08-25 21:18 ` linux
2016-08-26 10:19 ` Håkon Alstadheim
2016-08-30 12:35 ` Wei Liu
2016-08-30 22:13 ` Håkon Alstadheim
2016-09-05 9:20 ` linux
2016-09-05 9:25 ` Wei Liu
2016-09-05 9:46 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-05 10:02 ` linux
2016-09-05 10:25 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-05 11:19 ` linux
2016-09-05 11:43 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-05 12:00 ` linux
2016-10-13 14:43 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2016-10-17 15:28 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2016-10-18 12:48 ` Wei Liu [this message]
2016-10-18 21:32 ` Håkon Alstadheim
2016-10-25 11:24 ` Wei Liu
2016-10-25 11:37 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2016-10-25 14:49 ` Wei Liu
2016-10-25 15:00 ` Wei Liu
2016-10-25 17:25 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2016-10-25 17:26 ` Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161018124823.GM23219@citrix.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=cardoe@cardoe.com \
--cc=linux@eikelenboom.it \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.