From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43509)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <imammedo@redhat.com>) id 1bwS7y-0003dw-Nc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 07:00:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <imammedo@redhat.com>) id 1bwS7v-0007at-N9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 07:00:14 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54766)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <imammedo@redhat.com>) id 1bwS7v-0007Zi-I9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 07:00:11 -0400
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 13:00:07 +0200
From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20161018130007.623f1fa8@nial.brq.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <9a52afb0-79d1-0b53-a271-516724b766a6@ozlabs.ru>
References: <1475541180-16363-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru>
	<9a52afb0-79d1-0b53-a271-516724b766a6@ozlabs.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu] sysemu: support up to 1024 vCPUs
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:19:10 +1100
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote:

> Ping, anyone?
I have a similar patch
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/681709/
which bumps limit to 288 and does a little bit more
so it wouldn't affect current users.

After that's merged, I plan to get rid of this limit and
make that part of numa parsing code dynamic so that it
wouldn't impose such limit/any limits on target code.

> 
> 
> On 04/10/16 11:33, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > From: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Some systems can already provide more than 255 hardware threads.
> > 
> > Bumping the QEMU limit to 1024 seems reasonable:
> > - it has no visible overhead in top;
> > - the limit itself has no effect on hot paths.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
> > ---
> >  include/sysemu/sysemu.h | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/sysemu/sysemu.h b/include/sysemu/sysemu.h
> > index ef2c50b..2ec0bd8 100644
> > --- a/include/sysemu/sysemu.h
> > +++ b/include/sysemu/sysemu.h
> > @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ extern int mem_prealloc;
> >   *
> >   * Note that cpu->get_arch_id() may be larger than MAX_CPUMASK_BITS.
> >   */
> > -#define MAX_CPUMASK_BITS 255
> > +#define MAX_CPUMASK_BITS 1024
> >  
> >  #define MAX_OPTION_ROMS 16
> >  typedef struct QEMUOptionRom {
> >   
> 
>