All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
To: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/15] ethernet/dlink: use core min/max MTU checking
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:04:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161018150452.GU14983@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJe8K0Yme_do82WgD7L+eWsvbC2nSQr13Kohj0Jd3coAeHfrg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 04:45:51PM +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> On 10/17/16, Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> wrote:
> > dl2k: min_mtu 68, max_mtu 1536 or 8000, depending on hardware
> > - Removed change_mtu, does nothing productive anymore
> >
> > sundance: min_mtu 68, max_mtu 8191
> >
> > CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > CC: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/dlink/dl2k.c     | 22 ++++------------------
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/dlink/sundance.c |  6 ++++--
> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
...
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/dlink/sundance.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/dlink/sundance.c
> > index 79d8009..eab36ac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/dlink/sundance.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/dlink/sundance.c
> > @@ -580,6 +580,10 @@ static int sundance_probe1(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >  	dev->ethtool_ops = &ethtool_ops;
> >  	dev->watchdog_timeo = TX_TIMEOUT;
> >
> > +	/* MTU range: 68 - 8191 */
> > +	dev->min_mtu = ETH_MIN_MTU;
> > +	dev->max_mtu = 8191;
> > +
> ICPlus datasheet defines the max frame size like 0x1514 or 0x4491
> based on the RcvLargeFrames bit in the MACCtrl0 register

I do anticipate this patchset might bring to light some inaccuracies in
min/max mtu values currently implemented in various drivers, but for the
moment, I'm going for 100% identical behavior with what's currently in the
driver, and if you'll look down below...

> >  	pci_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);
> >
> >  	i = register_netdev(dev);
> > @@ -713,8 +717,6 @@ static int sundance_probe1(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >
> >  static int change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
> >  {
> > -	if ((new_mtu < 68) || (new_mtu > 8191)) /* Set by RxDMAFrameLen */

                                         ^^^^
The 8191 was simply transplanted from right here. I think altering the
value should be the subject of a separate patch.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jarod@redhat.com

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-18 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-17 19:54 [PATCH net-next 00/15] ethernet: use core min/max MTU checking Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next 01/15] ethernet/atheros: " Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next 02/15] ethernet/broadcom: " Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 19:54 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 03/15] ethernet/intel: " Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 19:54   ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 20:20   ` Jakub Kicinski
2016-10-17 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next 04/15] ethernet/marvell: " Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next 05/15] ethernet/mellanox: " Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next 06/15] ethernet/qlogic: " Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next 07/15] ethernet/realtek: " Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next 08/15] ethernet/sun: " Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next 09/15] ethernet/dlink: " Jarod Wilson
2016-10-18 13:45   ` Denis Kirjanov
2016-10-18 15:04     ` Jarod Wilson [this message]
2016-10-22  9:54       ` Stefan Richter
2016-10-17 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next 10/15] ethernet/neterion: " Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next 11/15] ethernet/cavium: " Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next 12/15] ethernet/ibm: " Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next 13/15] ethernet/tile: " Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next 14/15] ethernet/toshiba: " Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next 15/15] ethernet: " Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 19:54   ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 20:03 ` [PATCH net-next 00/15] " David Miller
2016-10-17 20:29   ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-18 15:33     ` David Miller
2016-10-18 22:28       ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-19  2:35         ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-18 15:34 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161018150452.GU14983@redhat.com \
    --to=jarod@redhat.com \
    --cc=kda@linux-powerpc.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.