All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHv3 0/6] printk: use printk_safe to handle printk() recursive calls
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:30:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161019093051.GG3102@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161019015357.GC513@swordfish>

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:53:57AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> not to miss out a DEFERRED_WARN patch set...
> //hm, I can't find it online
> 
>   Subject: [RFC 0/5] printk: Implement WARN_*DEFERRED()
>   Message-Id: <1474992135-14777-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com>

That never hit lkml, that msgid does not resolve on marc and I can only
find a few replies in my local lkml archive.

Can't say I like the idea though. Its propagating the printk() failure
up into more APIs instead of actually fixing it.

Esp. for WARN and the like you do not want DEFERRED, because DEFERRED
means you'll likely never actually get to see the problem because we're
dead by the time 'later' happens.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-19 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-18 15:40 [RFC][PATCHv3 0/6] printk: use printk_safe to handle printk() recursive calls Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-18 15:40 ` [RFC][PATCHv3 1/6] printk: use vprintk_func in vprintk() Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-18 16:49   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-10-19  1:54     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-18 15:40 ` [RFC][PATCHv3 2/6] printk: rename nmi.c and exported api Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-18 16:49   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-10-19  1:54     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-18 15:40 ` [RFC][PATCHv3 3/6] printk: introduce per-cpu safe_print seq buffer Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-18 16:46   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-10-19  1:10     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-19 13:42   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-18 15:40 ` [RFC][PATCHv3 4/6] printk: report lost messages in printk safe/nmi contexts Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-18 15:40 ` [RFC][PATCHv3 5/6] printk: use printk_safe buffers Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-18 15:40 ` [RFC][PATCHv3 6/6] printk: remove zap_locks() function Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-18 16:45 ` [RFC][PATCHv3 0/6] printk: use printk_safe to handle printk() recursive calls Joe Perches
2016-10-19  1:14   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-18 17:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-19  1:53   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-19  9:30     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-10-19 13:18   ` Petr Mladek
2016-10-19 13:34     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-20 13:18       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-19  4:33 ` Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161019093051.GG3102@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=calvinowens@fb.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.