From: Tim Walberg <twalberg@comcast.net>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Walberg, Tim" <tew@twin.jikos.cz>
Subject: regression in quota rescan, or intentional?
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 06:40:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161020114055.GD9047@comcast.net> (raw)
Just updated my kernel and btrfs-tools to 4.8.1 and now it seems
that "btrfs quota rescan -w <filesystem>" does not in fact wait
for the rescan to finish. Running it a second time immediately
after does, however.
Was this an intentional change, or is it a regression/bug?
--
twalberg@gmail.com, twalberg@comcast.net
reply other threads:[~2016-10-20 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161020114055.GD9047@comcast.net \
--to=twalberg@comcast.net \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tew@twin.jikos.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.