From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] PCIe port PM: high gloss polish & hotplug support
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:27:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161020142737.GN24289@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1476875113.git.lukas@wunner.de>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 04:07:13PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Linux v4.8 added support to runtime suspend PCIe ports to D3hot.
For some reason the patches arrived to my inbox in wrong order.
> Patches 1 to 6 of this series apply high gloss polish to that code to
> speed it up, reduce its size and improve its readability. None of these
> patches should result in a functional change. (And they didn't in my
> tests.)
>
> Patches 7 and 8 are cleanups / refactorings for acpiphp. They're prep
> work for patch 9 and likewise shouldn't cause a functional change.
I tested the patches 1-8 on a system with pretty recent thunderbolt
hardware, using ACPI based hotplug and it still works fine (meaning the
port is stays runtime active).
Also I can verify the ports that can suspend on my test systems still
suspend as expected.
So for patches 1-8 you can add my,
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Nice work!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-20 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-19 14:07 [PATCH 0/9] PCIe port PM: high gloss polish & hotplug support Lukas Wunner
2016-10-19 14:07 ` [PATCH 9/9] PCI: pciehp: Add runtime PM support for PCIe hotplug ports Lukas Wunner
2016-10-19 14:07 ` [PATCH 3/9] PCI: Speed up algorithm in pci_bridge_d3_update() Lukas Wunner
2016-10-19 14:07 ` [PATCH 2/9] PCI: Autosense device removal " Lukas Wunner
2016-10-19 14:07 ` [PATCH 7/9] ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Use cached copy of PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC bit Lukas Wunner
2016-10-19 14:07 ` [PATCH 1/9] PCI: Don't acquire ref on parent in pci_bridge_d3_update() Lukas Wunner
2016-10-19 14:07 ` [PATCH 4/9] PCI: Activate runtime PM on a PCIe port only if it can suspend Lukas Wunner
2016-10-19 14:07 ` [PATCH 8/9] ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Make device_is_managed_by_native_pciehp() public Lukas Wunner
2016-10-19 14:07 ` [PATCH 5/9] PCI: Consolidate conditions to allow runtime PM on PCIe ports Lukas Wunner
2016-10-19 14:07 ` [PATCH 6/9] PCI: Unfold conditions to block " Lukas Wunner
2016-10-20 14:18 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-10-25 5:28 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-10-20 14:27 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2016-10-20 23:21 ` [PATCH 0/9] PCIe port PM: high gloss polish & hotplug support Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161020142737.GN24289@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.