From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: New providers in rdma-core Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:35:13 -0600 Message-ID: <20161020163513.GB28181@obsidianresearch.com> References: <20161019163913.GA30843@infradead.org> <6b57d79c-dbd3-cd9b-061e-27a3d3968845@vmware.com> <20161019175926.GD29879@obsidianresearch.com> <12243e3b-87cf-2bd4-d097-1dd0a7907f41@vmware.com> <20161019200911.GA2666@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Amrani, Ram" Cc: Adit Ranadive , Christoph Hellwig , Leon Romanovsky , Lijun Ou , Knut Omang , Doug Ledford , linux-rdma List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:24:30AM +0000, Amrani, Ram wrote: > The idea looks good to me. > But still, I'm missing something - in order for libraries and the kernel to use the > same headers they should reside in the same repository. > Is that the long-term goal? And wouldn't that be mixing user/kernel spaces? See the discussion here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg42067.html Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html