From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:14:49 +0800 From: Xiaolong Zhang To: Stephen Boyd CC: , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Register clkdev after setup of fixed-rate and fixed-factor clocks Message-ID: <20161022081448.GB32560@spreadtrum.com> References: <1476184424-8528-1-git-send-email-orson.zhai@spreadtrum.com> <20161020230103.GD26139@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" In-Reply-To: <20161020230103.GD26139@codeaurora.org> List-ID: On ε››, 10月 20, 2016 at 04:01:03δΈ‹εˆ -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/11, Orson Zhai wrote: > > From: Xiaolong Zhang > > > > When common kernel setups fixed clock, of_clk_provider will be registerred. > > But there is no clkdev being registerred at the same time. This will make > > it difficult to get the clock by using clk_get(NULL, con_id). > > > > Add clkdev register for fixed-rate and fixed-factor clock and ignore > > the error if any. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Zhang > > Signed-off-by: Orson Zhai > > --- > > Why are we using clkdev lookups for clks populated from DT? > Shouldn't we be able to point to them from the consumers that > would also be in DT? I'm a little lost. > > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project The clk_get interface allows the first argument as NULL. We just assure consumers can get the clock from DT or by clock name.