From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/4] pwm: lpss: Avoid potential overflow of base_unit
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:43:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161024144325.130353-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161024144325.130353-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
The resolution of base_unit is derived from base_unit_bits and thus must be
equal to (2^base_unit_bits - 1). Otherwise frequency and therefore base_unit
might potentially overflow.
Prevent the above by substracting 1 in all cases where base_unit_bits or
derevative is used.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
index 72c0bce..8642fee 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int pwm_lpss_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
* The equation is:
* base_unit = round(base_unit_range * freq / c)
*/
- base_unit_range = BIT(lpwm->info->base_unit_bits);
+ base_unit_range = BIT(lpwm->info->base_unit_bits) - 1;
freq *= base_unit_range;
base_unit = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(freq, c);
@@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ static int pwm_lpss_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
ctrl = pwm_lpss_read(pwm);
ctrl &= ~PWM_ON_TIME_DIV_MASK;
- ctrl &= ~((base_unit_range - 1) << PWM_BASE_UNIT_SHIFT);
- base_unit &= (base_unit_range - 1);
+ ctrl &= ~(base_unit_range << PWM_BASE_UNIT_SHIFT);
+ base_unit &= base_unit_range;
ctrl |= (u32) base_unit << PWM_BASE_UNIT_SHIFT;
ctrl |= on_time_div;
pwm_lpss_write(pwm, ctrl);
--
2.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-24 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-24 14:43 [PATCH v1 0/4] pwm: lpss: clean up series Andy Shevchenko
2016-10-24 14:43 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2016-10-25 9:33 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] pwm: lpss: Avoid potential overflow of base_unit Mika Westerberg
2016-10-24 14:43 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] pwm: lpss: Allow duty cycle to be 0 Andy Shevchenko
2016-10-25 9:38 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-10-24 14:43 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] pwm: lpss: Do not export board infos for different PWM types Andy Shevchenko
2016-10-24 14:43 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] pwm: lpss: Switch to new atomic API Andy Shevchenko
2016-10-25 9:39 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-11-14 10:32 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] pwm: lpss: clean up series Andy Shevchenko
2016-12-14 16:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161024144325.130353-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.