From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: tca8418_keypad: hide gcc-4.9 -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:45:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161024234513.GA15034@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161024153222.2738294-1-arnd@arndb.de>
Hi Arnd,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 05:32:08PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Older versions of gcc warn about the tca8418_irq_handler function
> as they can't keep track of the variable assignment inside of the
> loop when using the -Wmaybe-unintialized flag:
>
> drivers/input/keyboard/tca8418_keypad.c: In function ‘tca8418_irq_handler’:
> drivers/input/keyboard/tca8418_keypad.c:172:9: error: ‘reg’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> drivers/input/keyboard/tca8418_keypad.c:165:5: note: ‘reg’ was declared here
>
> This is fixed in gcc-6, but it's possible to rearrange the code
> in a way that avoids the warning on older compilers as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> drivers/input/keyboard/tca8418_keypad.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/tca8418_keypad.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/tca8418_keypad.c
> index 9002298698fc..3048ef3e3e16 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/tca8418_keypad.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/tca8418_keypad.c
> @@ -164,11 +164,18 @@ static void tca8418_read_keypad(struct tca8418_keypad *keypad_data)
> int error, col, row;
> u8 reg, state, code;
>
> - /* Initial read of the key event FIFO */
> - error = tca8418_read_byte(keypad_data, REG_KEY_EVENT_A, ®);
> + do {
> + error = tca8418_read_byte(keypad_data, REG_KEY_EVENT_A, ®);
> + if (error < 0) {
> + dev_err(&keypad_data->client->dev,
> + "unable to read REG_KEY_EVENT_A\n");
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /* Assume that key code 0 signifies empty FIFO */
> + if (reg <= 0)
> + break;
I am unconvinced that this rearrangement fixes the issue for all older
GCCs. Can we simply do:
u8 uninitialized_var(reg);
and be done with it?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-24 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-24 15:32 [PATCH] Input: tca8418_keypad: hide gcc-4.9 -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-24 23:45 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2016-10-25 9:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-26 22:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161024234513.GA15034@dtor-ws \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.