From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "Shreyas B. Prabhu" <shreyasbp@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/64: Re-fix race condition between going idle and entering guest
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:54:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161025102418.GA3244@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161021090305.GA3809@fergus.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Hi Paul,
[Added Shreyas's current e-mail address ]
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 08:03:05PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Commit 8117ac6a6c2f ("powerpc/powernv: Switch off MMU before entering
> nap/sleep/rvwinkle mode", 2014-12-10) fixed a race condition where one
> thread entering a KVM guest could switch the MMU context to the guest
> while another thread was still in host kernel context with the MMU on.
> That commit moved the point where a thread entering a power-saving
> mode set its kvm_hstate.hwthread_state field in its PACA to
> KVM_HWTHREAD_IN_IDLE from a point where the MMU was on to after the
> MMU had been switched off. That commit also added a comment
> explaining that we have to switch to real mode before setting
> hwthread_state to avoid this race.
>
> Nevertheless, commit 4eae2c9ae54a ("powerpc/powernv: Make
> pnv_powersave_common more generic", 2016-07-08) subsequently moved
> the setting of hwthread_state back to a point where the MMU is on,
> thus reintroducing the race, despite the comment saying that this
> should not be done being included in full in the context lines of
> the patch that did it.
>
Sorry about missing that part. I am at fault, since I reviewed
4eae2c9ae54a patch. Will keep this in mind in the future.
> This fixes the race again and adds a bigger and shoutier comment
> explaining the potential race condition.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.8
> Fixes: 4eae2c9ae54a
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S
> index bd739fe..0d8712a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S
> @@ -163,12 +163,6 @@ _GLOBAL(pnv_powersave_common)
> std r9,_MSR(r1)
> std r1,PACAR1(r13)
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE
> - /* Tell KVM we're entering idle */
> - li r4,KVM_HWTHREAD_IN_IDLE
> - stb r4,HSTATE_HWTHREAD_STATE(r13)
> -#endif
> -
> /*
> * Go to real mode to do the nap, as required by the architecture.
> * Also, we need to be in real mode before setting hwthread_state,
> @@ -185,6 +179,26 @@ _GLOBAL(pnv_powersave_common)
>
> .globl pnv_enter_arch207_idle_mode
> pnv_enter_arch207_idle_mode:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE
> + /* Tell KVM we're entering idle */
> + li r4,KVM_HWTHREAD_IN_IDLE
> + /******************************************************/
> + /* N O T E W E L L ! ! ! N O T E W E L L */
> + /* The following store to HSTATE_HWTHREAD_STATE(r13) */
> + /* MUST occur in real mode, i.e. with the MMU off, */
> + /* and the MMU must stay off until we clear this flag */
> + /* and test HSTATE_HWTHREAD_REQ(r13) in the system */
> + /* reset interrupt vector in exceptions-64s.S. */
> + /* The reason is that another thread can switch the */
> + /* MMU to a guest context whenever this flag is set */
> + /* to KVM_HWTHREAD_IN_IDLE, and if the MMU was on, */
> + /* that would potentially cause this thread to start */
> + /* executing instructions from guest memory in */
> + /* hypervisor mode, leading to a host crash or data */
> + /* corruption, or worse. */
> + /******************************************************/
> + stb r4,HSTATE_HWTHREAD_STATE(r13)
> +#endif
> stb r3,PACA_THREAD_IDLE_STATE(r13)
> cmpwi cr3,r3,PNV_THREAD_SLEEP
> bge cr3,2f
> @@ -250,6 +264,12 @@ enter_winkle:
> * r3 - requested stop state
> */
> power_enter_stop:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE
> + /* Tell KVM we're entering idle */
> + li r4,KVM_HWTHREAD_IN_IDLE
> + /* DO THIS IN REAL MODE! See comment above. */
> + stb r4,HSTATE_HWTHREAD_STATE(r13)
> +#endif
> /*
> * Check if the requested state is a deep idle state.
> */
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-25 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-21 9:03 [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/64: Re-fix race condition between going idle and entering guest Paul Mackerras
2016-10-21 9:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/64: Fix race condition in setting lock bit in idle/wakeup code Paul Mackerras
2016-10-25 11:46 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-10-26 10:21 ` [2/2] " Michael Ellerman
2016-10-21 12:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/64: Re-fix race condition between going idle and entering guest Shreyas B. Prabhu
2016-10-25 10:24 ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2016-10-26 10:21 ` [1/2] " Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161025102418.GA3244@in.ibm.com \
--to=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=shreyasbp@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.