From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mchehab@s-opensource.com (Mauro Carvalho Chehab)
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:05:35 -0200
Subject: Latest kernel documentation tree
In-Reply-To: <CABEz4DVLM1pB2wHuCWQ=d8TGwnTLWa+MgEDEqHjNwChPm_a3Yg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABEz4DUR891G5L1NbDap7FmD4N_g3AkTg853sOLw1M1M9JWz0Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20161026083354.GA11680@kroah.com>
	<CABEz4DVLM1pB2wHuCWQ=d8TGwnTLWa+MgEDEqHjNwChPm_a3Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20161026090535.098f26ae@vento.lan>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

Em Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:25:13 +0530
Jai Krishna <rjk1024@gmail.com> escreveu:

> > Have you looked at MAINTAINERS?  It shows that:
> >         T:      git git://git.lwn.net/linux.git docs-next
> > is the tree to look at.  Have you tried that?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h  
> 
> Doh! Didnt occur to me to look in MAINTAINERS first.
> 
> Thats my lesson for the day!

Jai, let me hijack this thread, to use it as an example :)

Hi Jon,

That's why I think we should add MAINTAINERS somehow at the documentation...

This is not the first time I've seen someone wanting to contribute
but not being able to find the proper maintainer or development tree,
because he's unaware about the contents of MAINTAINERS.

Regards,
Mauro