From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:60478 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1754217AbcJZPhE (ORCPT
        <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:37:04 -0400
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:36:32 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@hpe.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 0/5] CVE fixes for stable 4.4
Message-ID: <20161026153632.GA27371@kroah.com>
References: <20161026150036.3172-1-juerg.haefliger@hpe.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161026150036.3172-1-juerg.haefliger@hpe.com>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 05:00:31PM +0200, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
> This series fixes the following CVEs:
>   1/5: CVE-2016-8658
>   2/5: CVE-2016-7097
>   4/5: CVE-2016-8666
> 
> 3-5 is a patch series that also fixes a performance issue with GRO
> encapsulation.

Thanks for these, I'll apply them in the next round of kernels after
this one.

Just curious, why all of the interest in the 4.4-stable kernel tree?
I'm not complaining, as it is really helpful...

thanks,

greg k-h