From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:42:58 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] blk-mq: Introduce blk_mq_quiesce_queue() Message-ID: <20161027124258.GD13200@lst.de> References: <5143c240-39af-9fe2-d3e6-ed69f9c20531@sandisk.com> <7690b469-f5b7-ab04-4b6f-fa0d679e0f18@acm.org> <16074653-5e31-27b0-90db-33d36a9df0bc@acm.org> <8404f2d1-5bc3-6c84-7ca0-24e7672ff67d@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8404f2d1-5bc3-6c84-7ca0-24e7672ff67d@acm.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Keith Busch , James Bottomley , "Martin K. Petersen" , Mike Snitzer , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , Ming Lei , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , Jens Axboe , Doug Ledford , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , Laurence Oberman , Christoph Hellwig Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+axboe=kernel.dk@lists.infradead.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 08:05:14PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > I'll leave it to Jens to decide whether I should repost the patch series > with this change integrated or whether to realize this change with a > follow-up patch. I would prefer to get the series in now. I think we should eventually the stop queues call, the quience call and even the cancellation of the requeues into a single function, but it's not as urgent. I think this series actually is Linux 4.9 material. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:42:58 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 05/12] blk-mq: Introduce blk_mq_quiesce_queue() In-Reply-To: <8404f2d1-5bc3-6c84-7ca0-24e7672ff67d@acm.org> References: <5143c240-39af-9fe2-d3e6-ed69f9c20531@sandisk.com> <7690b469-f5b7-ab04-4b6f-fa0d679e0f18@acm.org> <16074653-5e31-27b0-90db-33d36a9df0bc@acm.org> <8404f2d1-5bc3-6c84-7ca0-24e7672ff67d@acm.org> Message-ID: <20161027124258.GD13200@lst.de> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016@08:05:14PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > I'll leave it to Jens to decide whether I should repost the patch series > with this change integrated or whether to realize this change with a > follow-up patch. I would prefer to get the series in now. I think we should eventually the stop queues call, the quience call and even the cancellation of the requeues into a single function, but it's not as urgent. I think this series actually is Linux 4.9 material. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] blk-mq: Introduce blk_mq_quiesce_queue() Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:42:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20161027124258.GD13200@lst.de> References: <5143c240-39af-9fe2-d3e6-ed69f9c20531@sandisk.com> <7690b469-f5b7-ab04-4b6f-fa0d679e0f18@acm.org> <16074653-5e31-27b0-90db-33d36a9df0bc@acm.org> <8404f2d1-5bc3-6c84-7ca0-24e7672ff67d@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8404f2d1-5bc3-6c84-7ca0-24e7672ff67d@acm.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bart Van Assche Cc: Ming Lei , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , "Martin K. Petersen" , Mike Snitzer , Doug Ledford , Keith Busch , Laurence Oberman , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 08:05:14PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > I'll leave it to Jens to decide whether I should repost the patch series > with this change integrated or whether to realize this change with a > follow-up patch. I would prefer to get the series in now. I think we should eventually the stop queues call, the quience call and even the cancellation of the requeues into a single function, but it's not as urgent. I think this series actually is Linux 4.9 material.