All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 iproute2 net-next] tc: m_mirred: Fix parsing of 'index' optional argument
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 17:22:39 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161027172239.7bf5cc40@pixies> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161027094633.GR5640@orbyte.nwl.cc>

Hi Phil,

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:46:33 +0200, phil@nwl.cc wrote:
> According to the action's help text (and the man page which is based
> upon that), this behaviour is perfectly fine:
> 
> | Usage: mirred <DIRECTION> <ACTION> [index INDEX] <dev DEVICENAME>
> 
> So first argument *must* be the direction, second one *must* be the
> action, then an optional index and the last one *must* be the interface.

There is an inconsistency betweem man/help and code.

Actual code, since first committed, attempts to parse "index" as 1st
argument (without success), see parse_mirred():

	if (matches(*argv, "egress") == 0 || matches(*argv, "index") == 0) {
		int ret = parse_egress(a, &argc, &argv, tca_id, n);

> While I don't see a problem with changing that (apart from that I don't
> think it's necessary)

Not "changing" per-se, but rather "fixing", at least according code
author's intention :)

As I suggested in the notes part of the commit log,

>> An alternative solution: banning "index" as 1st argument in parse_mirred

I ok with removing the code trying to support "index" as 1st argument as
well.
I only assumed one might want this behaviour due to intention expressed
by original code.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-27 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-27  7:36 [PATCHv2 iproute2 net-next] tc: m_mirred: Fix parsing of 'index' optional argument Shmulik Ladkani
2016-10-27  9:46 ` Phil Sutter
2016-10-27 14:22   ` Shmulik Ladkani [this message]
2016-10-27 14:56     ` Phil Sutter
2016-10-27 19:00       ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-11-29 20:34         ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161027172239.7bf5cc40@pixies \
    --to=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phil@nwl.cc \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.