From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Reply-To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 20:48:04 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra Message-ID: <20161028184804.GN3142@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20161027082801.GE3568@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20161027091104.GB19469@amd> <20161027093334.GK3102@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20161027212747.GA18147@amd> <20161028095141.GA5806@leverpostej> <20161028112136.GA5635@amd> <20161028140522.GH5806@leverpostej> <20161028141840.GI3142@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20161028183013.GA13354@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161028183013.GA13354@amd> Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] rowhammer protection [was Re: Getting interrupt every million cache misses] To: Pavel Machek Cc: Mark Rutland , Kees Cook , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , kernel list , Ingo Molnar , Alexander Shishkin , "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" List-ID: On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 08:30:14PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Would you (or someone) have pointer to good documentation source on > available performance counters? The Intel SDM has a section on them and the AMD Bios and Kernel Developers Guide does too. That is, they contain lists of available counters for the various parts from these vendors and that's pretty much all there is.