From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarod Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-core v2 4/4] redhat/spec: build split rpm packages Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:55:25 -0400 Message-ID: <20161028215525.GT42084@redhat.com> References: <20161014192136.11731-1-jarod@redhat.com> <20161020153357.27286-1-jarod@redhat.com> <20161020153357.27286-5-jarod@redhat.com> <20161027211059.GA7224@obsidianresearch.com> <20161028171147.GJ42084@redhat.com> <20161028172503.GA28451@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161028172503.GA28451-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:25:03AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 01:11:47PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:10:59PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:33:57AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > > @@ -7,10 +7,11 @@ Summary: RDMA core userspace libraries and daemons > > > > # providers/ipathverbs/ Dual licensed using a BSD license with an extra patent clause > > > > # providers/rxe/ Incorporates code from ipathverbs and contains the patent clause > > > > # providers/hfi1verbs Uses the 3 Clause BSD license > > > > -License: (GPLv2 or BSD) and (GPLv2 or PathScale-BSD) > > > > +License: GPLv2 or BSD > > > > > > Is this Ok? The Fedora guidelines I read suggested the PathScale > > > license would need to be assigned a short tag, and I'd be surprised if > > > 'BSD' is the right tag due to the patent stuff.. > > > > Our standalone libipathverbs has just "GPLv2 or BSD", > > I suspect that was a mistake, the difference in the pathscale license > is subtle and several other people assumed it was the cannonical 'BSD' > text... I sent something off to the Fedora legal mailing list, we'll see what they have to say. I didn't find anything interesting in the initial package review, nobody questioned the license there, but that could easily have been an oversight. -- Jarod Wilson jarod-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html