From: bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields)
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
Anna Schumaker <schumakeranna@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] NFSv4.2 umask support
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 16:28:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161029202850.GA23842@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHc6FU5i3aDDNUKLUot9B8hjbiMxFR4nipB3b-ROa9k4a6KhPQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 11:38:43AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:23 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> wrote:
> > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
> >
> > The following patches allow the umask to be ignored in the presence of
> > inheritable NFSv4 ACLs. Otherwise inheritable ACLs can be rendered
> > mostly useless whenever the umask masks out group bits.
> >
> > This solves a problem we've seen complaints about for some time, both
> > upstream and from RHEL users.
> >
> > The new protocol has been discussed in the IETF working group and is
> > documented at:
> >
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask-02
> >
> > It's unlikely that we'll discover problems requiring an incompatible
> > change, so I think we should consider this for 4.10.
>
> Nope, these patches don't implement draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask-02 yet,
They don't? What did I miss?
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-29 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-28 20:23 [PATCH 0/2] NFSv4.2 umask support J. Bruce Fields
2016-10-28 20:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfs: add support for the umask attribute J. Bruce Fields
2016-10-28 20:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: " J. Bruce Fields
2016-10-28 20:28 ` [PATCH 0/2] NFSv4.2 umask support J. Bruce Fields
2016-10-29 9:38 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2016-10-29 20:28 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2016-10-29 22:10 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2016-10-29 22:20 ` [PATCH 0/2] NFSv4.2 mode_umask support Andreas Gruenbacher
2016-10-29 22:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfs: add support for the umask attribute Andreas Gruenbacher
2016-10-29 22:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: " Andreas Gruenbacher
2016-10-30 13:59 ` [PATCH 0/2] NFSv4.2 mode_umask support J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161029202850.GA23842@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schumakeranna@gmail.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.