From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-aio@kvack.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: fix a user triggered use after free (and fix freeze protection of aio writes)
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 11:52:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161030105231.GA16015@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161030094437.GA3225@quack2.suse.cz>
On Sun 30-10-16 10:44:37, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sat 29-10-16 13:09:25, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > AFAICS, the possibility of dropping the last reference to struct file
> > > before ->write_iter() has returned is fundamentally broken. I might be
> > > missing something subtle here, but...
> >
> > Ok, let's add a get_file(); fput(); around that whole iter call sequence.
> >
> > And that's a separate issue from "we should hold the fs freezer lock
> > around the whole operation". So I think we need both.
>
> Yup, these are two separate issues. I'm fine with adding get_file(); fput()
> around the iter call sequence. Then, when we have struct file available for
> the whole time ->write_iter runs, I'd prefer to keep the call to fool
> lockdep where original file_end_write() call was - that gives us proper
> lockdep coverage for all the code behind iter_op(). The downside is we
> cannot keep helpers as elegant as you suggested in your patch but I believe
> it's bearable and worth the additional lockdep coverage. I'll send patches
> shortly...
Hum, the additional refcount patch oopses on me when running generic/323,
I'll have to board to my flight to US shortly so I won't be able to send it
soon - maybe when I'm transferring in Denver ;).
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-30 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-29 7:44 aio: fix a user triggered use after free Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-29 7:44 ` [PATCH] aio: fix a user triggered use after free (and fix freeze protection of aio writes) Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-29 12:24 ` Al Viro
2016-10-29 15:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-29 16:12 ` Al Viro
2016-10-29 16:29 ` Al Viro
2016-10-30 6:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-29 17:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-29 18:52 ` Al Viro
2016-10-29 19:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-29 19:17 ` Al Viro
2016-10-29 20:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-30 9:44 ` Jan Kara
2016-10-30 10:52 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2016-10-30 15:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-30 6:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161030105231.GA16015@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.