From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 09:38:29 +0000 Message-ID: <20161031093829.GA8845@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <20161020122931.GD19876@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20161021154129.GH27807@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20161021202022.GI27807@codeblueprint.co.uk> <4a73a7d8-599c-eb25-0f78-d921a16bb56f@leemhuis.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Dan Williams Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis , LKML , linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Peter Jones , Ard Biesheuvel , Ingo Molnar List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 30 Oct, at 08:59:58AM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis > wrote: > > JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll > > watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress > > in my weekly reports. Please let me know via regressions-rCxcAJFjeRkk+I/owrrOrA@public.gmane.org > > in case the discussion moves to a different place (bugzilla or another > > mail thread for example). tia! > > > > Current status (afaics) in my report: This looks stuck. Or was is > > discussed (or even fixed) somewhere else? > > Thanks, and no, not fixed yet. I've not found the time to run the > experiments Matt needs, but a colleague has offered to look into it. Of course, if you are willing to help with debugging, Thorsten, it would be much appreciated and this bug might get fixed sooner. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932396AbcJaJif (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 05:38:35 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:38484 "EHLO mail-wm0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764115AbcJaJic (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 05:38:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 09:38:29 +0000 From: Matt Fleming To: Dan Williams Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis , LKML , linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Peter Jones , Ard Biesheuvel , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Message-ID: <20161031093829.GA8845@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <20161020122931.GD19876@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20161021154129.GH27807@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20161021202022.GI27807@codeblueprint.co.uk> <4a73a7d8-599c-eb25-0f78-d921a16bb56f@leemhuis.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24+41 (02bc14ed1569) (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 30 Oct, at 08:59:58AM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis > wrote: > > JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll > > watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress > > in my weekly reports. Please let me know via regressions@leemhuis.info > > in case the discussion moves to a different place (bugzilla or another > > mail thread for example). tia! > > > > Current status (afaics) in my report: This looks stuck. Or was is > > discussed (or even fixed) somewhere else? > > Thanks, and no, not fixed yet. I've not found the time to run the > experiments Matt needs, but a colleague has offered to look into it. Of course, if you are willing to help with debugging, Thorsten, it would be much appreciated and this bug might get fixed sooner.