From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Reply-To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Sender: Ingo Molnar Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 07:33:59 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar Message-ID: <20161101063359.GA27822@gmail.com> References: <20161026204748.GA11177@amd> <20161027082801.GE3568@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20161027091104.GB19469@amd> <20161027093334.GK3102@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20161027212747.GA18147@amd> <20161028095141.GA5806@leverpostej> <20161028112136.GA5635@amd> <20161028140522.GH5806@leverpostej> <20161031082705.GA2863@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161031082705.GA2863@amd> Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] rowhammer protection [was Re: Getting interrupt every million cache misses] To: Pavel Machek Cc: Mark Rutland , Kees Cook , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , kernel list , Ingo Molnar , Alexander Shishkin , "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" List-ID: * Pavel Machek wrote: > I'm not going to buy broken hardware just for a test. Can you suggest a method to find heavily rowhammer affected hardware? Only by testing it, or are there some chipset IDs ranges or dmidecode info that will pinpoint potentially affected machines? Thanks, Ingo