From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "Vangati, Narender" <narender.vangati@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Eads, Gage" <gage.eads@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH v2] libeventdev: event driven programming model framework for DPDK
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 20:24:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161102145440.GA8552@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161102135627.GA42352@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 01:56:27PM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 06:39:27PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 11:35:51AM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 04:55:22PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 02:36:48PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 09:36:46AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 08:31:41AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:54:14PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 05:54:17PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > > > > > > How about making default as "mixed" and let application configures what
> > > > > > > is not required?. That way application responsibility is clear.
> > > > > > > something similar to ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOMULTSEGS, ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOREFCOUNT
> > > > > > > with default.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > I suppose it could work, but why bother doing that? If an app knows it's
> > > > > > only going to use one traffic type, why not let it just state what it
> > > > > > will do rather than try to specify what it won't do. If mixed is needed,
> > > > >
> > > > > My thought was more inline with ethdev spec, like, ref-count is default,
> > > > > if application need exception then set ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOREFCOUNT. But it is OK, if
> > > > > you need other way.
> > > > >
> > > > > > then it's easy enough to specify - and we can make it the zero/default
> > > > > > value too.
> > > > >
> > > > > OK. Then we will make MIX as zero/default and add "allowed_event_types" in
> > > > > event queue config.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bruce,
> > > >
> > > > I have tried to make it as "allowed_event_types" in event queue config.
> > > > However, rte_event_queue_default_conf_get() can also take NULL for default
> > > > configuration. So I think, It makes sense to go with negation approach
> > > > like ethdev to define the default to avoid confusion on the default. So
> > > > I am thinking like below now,
> > > >
> > > > ➜ [master][libeventdev] $ git diff
> > > > diff --git a/rte_eventdev.h b/rte_eventdev.h
> > > > index cf22b0e..cac4642 100644
> > > > --- a/rte_eventdev.h
> > > > +++ b/rte_eventdev.h
> > > > @@ -429,6 +429,12 @@ rte_event_dev_configure(uint8_t dev_id, struct
> > > > rte_event_dev_config *config);
> > > > *
> > > > * \see rte_event_port_setup(), rte_event_port_link()
> > > > */
> > > > +#define RTE_EVENT_QUEUE_CFG_NOATOMIC_TYPE (1ULL << 1)
> > > > +/**< Skip configuring atomic schedule type resources */
> > > > +#define RTE_EVENT_QUEUE_CFG_NOORDERED_TYPE (1ULL << 2)
> > > > +/**< Skip configuring ordered schedule type resources */
> > > > +#define RTE_EVENT_QUEUE_CFG_NOPARALLEL_TYPE (1ULL << 3)
> > > > +/**< Skip configuring parallel schedule type resources */
> > > >
> > > > /** Event queue configuration structure */
> > > > struct rte_event_queue_conf {
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'm ok with the default as being all types, in the case where NULL is
> > > specified for the parameter. It does make the most sense.
> >
> > Yes. That case I need to explicitly mention in the documentation about what
> > is default case. With RTE_EVENT_QUEUE_CFG_NOATOMIC_TYPE scheme it quite
> > understood what is default. Not adding up? :-)
> >
>
> Would below not work? DEFAULT explicitly stated, and can be commented to
> say all types allowed.
All I was trying to avoid explicitly stating the default state. Not worth
to have back and forth on slow path configuration, I will keep it as
positive logic as you suggested :-) and inspired from PKT_TX_L4_MASK
#define RTE_EVENT_QUEUE_CFG_TYPE_MASK (3ULL << 0)
#define RTE_EVENT_QUEUE_CFG_ALL_TYPES (0ULL << 0) /**< Enable all types */
#define RTE_EVENT_QUEUE_CFG_ATOMIC_ONLY (1ULL << 0)
#define RTE_EVENT_QUEUE_CFG_ORDERED_ONLY (2ULL << 0)
#define RTE_EVENT_QUEUE_CFG_PARALLEL_ONLY (3ULL << 0)
#define RTE_EVENT_QUEUE_CFG_SINGLE_CONSUMER (1ULL << 2)
>
> #define RTE_EVENT_QUEUE_CFG_DEFAULT 0
> #define RTE_EVENT_QUEUE_CFG_ALL_TYPES RTE_EVENT_QUEUE_CFG_DEFAULT
> #define RTE_EVENT_QUEUE_CFG_ATOMIC_ONLY (1<<0)
> #define RTE_EVENT_QUEUE_CFG_ORDERED_ONLY (1<<1)
> ....
>
> /Bruce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-02 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-04 21:49 [RFC] libeventdev: event driven programming model framework for DPDK Vangati, Narender
2016-10-05 7:24 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-07 10:40 ` Hemant Agrawal
2016-10-09 8:27 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-11 19:30 ` [RFC] [PATCH v2] " Jerin Jacob
2016-10-14 4:14 ` Bill Fischofer
2016-10-14 9:26 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-14 10:30 ` Hemant Agrawal
2016-10-14 12:52 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-14 15:00 ` Eads, Gage
2016-10-17 4:18 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-17 20:26 ` Eads, Gage
2016-10-18 11:19 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-14 16:02 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-10-17 5:10 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-25 17:49 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-26 12:11 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2016-10-26 12:24 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-26 12:54 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-10-28 3:01 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-28 8:36 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-10-28 9:06 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-02 11:25 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-02 11:35 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-11-02 13:09 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-02 13:56 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-11-02 14:54 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2016-10-26 18:37 ` Vincent Jardin
2016-10-28 13:10 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2016-11-02 10:47 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-02 11:45 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-11-02 12:34 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-26 12:43 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-10-26 17:30 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-28 13:48 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2016-10-28 14:16 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-11-02 8:59 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-02 8:06 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-02 11:48 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-11-02 12:57 ` Jerin Jacob
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-14 15:00 Francois Ozog
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161102145440.GA8552@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gage.eads@intel.com \
--cc=narender.vangati@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.