From: Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Chase Metzger <chasemetzger15@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>, Hans Yang <hansy@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] USB hub_probe: remove ugly goto-into-compound-statement
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 20:59:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161102175944.GA31229@vnote> (raw)
Rework smelling code (goto inside compound statement). Perhaps this is legacy.
Anyway such code is not appropriate for Linux kernel.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@gmail.com>
---
drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
index cbb1467..4081672 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
@@ -1802,23 +1802,21 @@ static int hub_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id)
/* Some hubs have a subclass of 1, which AFAICT according to the */
/* specs is not defined, but it works */
- if ((desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 0) &&
- (desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 1)) {
-descriptor_error:
+
+ /* Reject in following cases:
+ * - Interface subclass is not 0 or 1
+ * - Multiple endpoints
+ * - Not an interrupt in endpoint
+ */
+ endpoint = &desc->endpoint[0].desc;
+ if ((desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 0 &&
+ desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 1) ||
+ desc->desc.bNumEndpoints != 1 ||
+ !usb_endpoint_is_int_in(endpoint)) {
dev_err(&intf->dev, "bad descriptor, ignoring hub\n");
return -EIO;
}
- /* Multiple endpoints? What kind of mutant ninja-hub is this? */
- if (desc->desc.bNumEndpoints != 1)
- goto descriptor_error;
-
- endpoint = &desc->endpoint[0].desc;
-
- /* If it's not an interrupt in endpoint, we'd better punt! */
- if (!usb_endpoint_is_int_in(endpoint))
- goto descriptor_error;
-
/* We found a hub */
dev_info(&intf->dev, "USB hub found\n");
--
2.10.2
next reply other threads:[~2016-11-02 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-02 17:59 Eugene Korenevsky [this message]
2016-11-07 9:09 ` [PATCH v2] USB hub_probe: remove ugly goto-into-compound-statement Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-11-07 18:42 ` Eugene Korenevsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161102175944.GA31229@vnote \
--to=ekorenevsky@gmail.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chasemetzger15@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hansy@nvidia.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.