From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] ARM: dts: exynos: replace to "max-frequecy" instead of "clock-freq-min-max" Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 20:41:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20161103184112.GB11071@kozik-lap> References: <20161103062135.10697-1-jh80.chung@samsung.com> <20161103062135.10697-11-jh80.chung@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161103062135.10697-11-jh80.chung@samsung.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jaehoon Chung Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzk@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:21:32PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > In drivers/mmc/core/host.c, there is "max-frequency" property. > It should be same behavior. So Use the "max-frequency" instead of > "clock-freq-min-max". > > Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5-eval.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-monk.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-rinato.dts | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) This looks totally independent to rest of patches so it can be applied separately without any functional impact (except lack of minimum frequency). Is that correct? Best regards, Krzysztof From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: krzk@kernel.org (Krzysztof Kozlowski) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 20:41:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 10/13] ARM: dts: exynos: replace to "max-frequecy" instead of "clock-freq-min-max" In-Reply-To: <20161103062135.10697-11-jh80.chung@samsung.com> References: <20161103062135.10697-1-jh80.chung@samsung.com> <20161103062135.10697-11-jh80.chung@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20161103184112.GB11071@kozik-lap> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:21:32PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > In drivers/mmc/core/host.c, there is "max-frequency" property. > It should be same behavior. So Use the "max-frequency" instead of > "clock-freq-min-max". > > Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5-eval.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-monk.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-rinato.dts | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) This looks totally independent to rest of patches so it can be applied separately without any functional impact (except lack of minimum frequency). Is that correct? Best regards, Krzysztof