From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, liushuoran@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: don't skip recovering inode depend on i_times
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 15:53:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161104225352.GA3339@jaegeuk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b58aaf87-8ce4-12b1-c535-ea48d8eeee59@huawei.com>
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 04:30:09PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2016/11/4 2:02, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 12:26:56AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> i_times of inode will be set with current system time which can be
> >> configured through 'date', so it's not safe to judge dnode block as
> >> garbage data depend on i_times.
> >
> > This is not to detect garbage data, but to skip redundant unchanged inode.
>
> Oops, seems 807b1e1c8e08 ("f2fs: do not recover from previous remained wrong
> dnodes") did't describe like that. But after reading the codes, it looks like
> the purpose of this change is to skip unchanged inode. So, commit log in
> original is incorrect, right?
Oh, right. This indicats both of purposes: stale data and detecting same inodes.
Let me just revert the original patch.
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-04 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-03 16:26 [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: fix wrong i_atime recovery Chao Yu
2016-11-03 16:26 ` Chao Yu
2016-11-03 16:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: don't skip recovering inode depend on i_times Chao Yu
2016-11-03 16:26 ` Chao Yu
2016-11-03 18:02 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-11-04 8:30 ` Chao Yu
2016-11-04 8:30 ` Chao Yu
2016-11-04 22:53 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2016-11-05 3:12 ` Chao Yu
2016-11-05 7:02 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161104225352.GA3339@jaegeuk \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liushuoran@huawei.com \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.