From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit pci_platform_pm_ops ->get_state hook
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 18:12:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161106171217.GA5922@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92ac10c1-84e4-0e73-a12d-69e66aac9c45@leemhuis.info>
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 02:43:33PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 26.10.2016 17:01, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 15:06 +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> >> So the conclusion is to apply this patch now and go and look further @
> >> locking in a separate series right ? There's not much point in leaving
> >> Edison not booting as is the case with tip-of-tree right now.
> >
> > That's what I think is a summary of the discussion.
>
> Did anything happen after that conclusion? Just wondering, because this
> bug is on the list of regressions for 4.9 and I think the proposed fix
> hasn't reached mainline yet (or did I miss it?)
The patch still awaits merging through tip. I assume the x86 maintainers
were traveling (KS, LPC) or generally busy.
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-06 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-23 11:55 [PATCH v3 0/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit pci_platform_pm_ops Lukas Wunner
2016-10-23 11:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit pci_platform_pm_ops ->get_state hook Lukas Wunner
2016-10-23 12:37 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-10-23 14:57 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-10-23 16:25 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-10-24 9:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-10-24 10:09 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-10-24 11:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-10-25 6:19 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-10-26 14:06 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-10-26 15:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-11-06 13:43 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2016-11-06 17:12 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2016-11-07 12:12 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Lukas Wunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161106171217.GA5922@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pure.logic@nexus-software.ie \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.