From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:47840 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751167AbcKFX32 (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Nov 2016 18:29:28 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id uA6NSfPQ008023 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 18:28:52 -0500 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com (e33.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.151]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 26j7r1vbeg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 18:28:51 -0500 Received: from localhost by e33.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 16:28:51 -0700 Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 15:28:49 -0800 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rt: Insert missing NBSPs Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20161106175234.13878-1-sj38.park@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161106175234.13878-1-sj38.park@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20161106232849.GK24166@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: perfbook-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: SeongJae Park Cc: perfbook@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 02:52:33AM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote: > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park Queued, thank you! Thanx, Paul > --- > rt/rt.tex | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/rt/rt.tex b/rt/rt.tex > index 21a53a4514b8..870bc9af6e0b 100644 > --- a/rt/rt.tex > +++ b/rt/rt.tex > @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ cylinder contained in the log to the blade, > Each of these six phases of operation might well have its own set of > deadlines and environmental constraints, > for example, one would expect phase~4's deadlines to be much more severe > -than those of phase 6, milliseconds instead of seconds. > +than those of phase~6, milliseconds instead of seconds. > One might therefore expect that low-priority work would be performed in > phase~6 rather than in phase~4. > That said, careful choices of hardware, drivers, and software configuration > @@ -1429,7 +1429,7 @@ only being one runnable task on that CPU is said to be in > \emph{adaptive ticks mode}. > > As an alternative to the \co{nohz_full=} boot parameter, you can build > -your kernel with \co{NO_HZ_FULL_ALL}, which will designate CPU 0 as > +your kernel with \co{NO_HZ_FULL_ALL}, which will designate CPU~0 as > a housekeeping CPU and all other CPUs as worker CPUs. > Either way, it is important to ensure that you have designated enough > housekeeping CPUs to handle the housekeeping load imposed by the > -- > 2.10.0 >