From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <hch@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 15:56:52 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] pci: add pci_irq_get_affinity_vector()
Message-ID: <20161108145652.GA12817@lst.de>
References: <1478591241-123356-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <1478591241-123356-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>
List-ID: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:47:21AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Add a reverse-mapping function to return the interrupt vector for
> any CPU if interrupt affinity is enabled.

What's the use case of it?

Also as-is this won't work due to the non-affinity vectors that
have the affinity set to all cpus.  It will get even worse if we have
to support things like virtio_net that have multiple interrupts per
CPU due to the send and receive virtqueues.