From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Vince Weaver <vince@deater.net>,
Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
kan.liang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86: Fix overlap counter scheduling bug
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 07:09:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161108150949.GM26852@two.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161108122039.GP3142@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Adding Kan who actually maintains the uncore drivers these days.
> Which is two distinct groups, only one of which has overlap. And the one
> with overlap only has 2 overlapping masks, giving a max reties of 1.
Looks reasonable to limit the mask.
Are we sure this problem isn't in the other 0xc masks too ?
-Andi
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> index 272427700d48..71bc348736bd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> @@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ static struct event_constraint snbep_uncore_cbox_constraints[] = {
> UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x1c, 0xc),
> UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x1d, 0xc),
> UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x1e, 0xc),
> - EVENT_CONSTRAINT_OVERLAP(0x1f, 0xe, 0xff),
> + UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x1f, 0xc); /* should be 0x0e but that gives scheduling pain */
> UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x21, 0x3),
> UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x23, 0x3),
> UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x31, 0x3),
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-08 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-01 15:44 [PATCH] perf/x86: Fix overlap counter scheduling bug Jiri Olsa
2016-11-08 12:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-08 13:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-11-08 15:09 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2016-11-08 16:22 ` Liang, Kan
2016-11-08 16:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-08 17:25 ` Liang, Kan
2016-11-08 18:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-09 14:25 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-09 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 8:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-10 16:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-14 15:59 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-12-22 16:50 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161108150949.GM26852@two.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=vince@deater.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.