From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zimbra13.linbit.com (zimbra.linbit.com [212.69.161.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail09.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTPS id 585D01056471 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 17:51:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 17:51:43 +0100 From: Lars Ellenberg To: Richard Weinberger Message-ID: <20161109165143.GN1382@soda.linbit> References: <1478601789-15060-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1478601789-15060-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <497abc52-093f-17ea-5fb5-645030a23a01@nod.at> <20161108165204.GC2834@kernel.dk> <20161109153209.GK1382@soda.linbit> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Jens Axboe , wolfgang.glas@iteg.at, christoph.lechleitner@iteg.at, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, philipp.reisner@linbit.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH] drbd: Fix kernel_sendmsg() usage List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches, contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user, please." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 04:47:15PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > Should I sent two patches, one that applies to 4.5 and later, > > and one that applies to 2.6.33 ... 4.4, or are you or stable > > willing to resolve the trivial "missing comment block" conflict yourself? > > BTW: Why did you drop the "Fixes:" tag too? > By accident, probably. I'm ok with you guys just using the original, if you prefer, just let me know. It's the fix, that's important, not how much noise we can make about that oneliner. Lars From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934337AbcKIQvt (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 11:51:49 -0500 Received: from zimbra13.linbit.com ([212.69.166.240]:57591 "EHLO zimbra13.linbit.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933095AbcKIQvr (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 11:51:47 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 17:51:43 +0100 From: Lars Ellenberg To: Richard Weinberger Cc: Jens Axboe , wolfgang.glas@iteg.at, christoph.lechleitner@iteg.at, philipp.reisner@linbit.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH] drbd: Fix kernel_sendmsg() usage Message-ID: <20161109165143.GN1382@soda.linbit> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Weinberger , Jens Axboe , wolfgang.glas@iteg.at, christoph.lechleitner@iteg.at, philipp.reisner@linbit.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com References: <1478601789-15060-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1478601789-15060-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <497abc52-093f-17ea-5fb5-645030a23a01@nod.at> <20161108165204.GC2834@kernel.dk> <20161109153209.GK1382@soda.linbit> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 04:47:15PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > Should I sent two patches, one that applies to 4.5 and later, > > and one that applies to 2.6.33 ... 4.4, or are you or stable > > willing to resolve the trivial "missing comment block" conflict yourself? > > BTW: Why did you drop the "Fixes:" tag too? > By accident, probably. I'm ok with you guys just using the original, if you prefer, just let me know. It's the fix, that's important, not how much noise we can make about that oneliner. Lars