From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50437) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c52qa-0005pl-Q1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:49:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c52qV-00082r-VU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:49:48 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c52qV-00082X-PK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:49:43 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 05:49:41 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20161111054924-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1478794177-29377-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20161110152921.58253387@t450s.home> <20161111003049-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20161110154828.73d2cbf9@t450s.home> <20161111005034-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <58253105.8060507@cn.fujitsu.com> <20161111053146-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <58254046.20309@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <58254046.20309@cn.fujitsu.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/47] virtio, vhost, pc, pci: tests, documentation, fixes and cleanups List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cao jin Cc: Alex Williamson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell , Stefan Hajnoczi , Paolo Bonzini , Felipe Franciosi On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:51:34AM +0800, Cao jin wrote: > > > On 11/11/2016 11:32 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:46:29AM +0800, Cao jin wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 11/11/2016 06:51 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 03:48:28PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I think I'll drop this, this patchset was borderline useful anyway. > > > > > > > > > > Really sorry for the issue, I moved usb_xhci_init() too far from its > > > original place, results in the segmentation fault. > > > > > > Could I send new version of this patch to fix it right now? > > > > > > > > > > > OK but I'd like to know which other patches > > in the patchset are untested. You really must inform people > > when you post untested patches. > > > > I see, really sorry for my mistake. My patches just pass make check, didn't > test for each patch. > -- > Yours Sincerely, > > Cao jin > I think it's best to drop them for now in this case. -- MST