From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:33042 "EHLO
        out4-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751449AbcKNHij (ORCPT
        <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 14 Nov 2016 02:38:39 -0500
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 08:38:51 +0100
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can you hold off on 1e793f6fc0db920400574211c48f9157a37e3945
Message-ID: <20161114073851.GA7294@kroah.com>
References: <1478971324.3290.10.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1478971324.3290.10.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 09:22:04AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> The patch
> 
> commit 1e793f6fc0db920400574211c48f9157a37e3945
> Author: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
> Date:   Fri Oct 21 06:33:32 2016 -0700
> 
>     scsi: megaraid_sas: Fix data integrity failure for JBOD
> (passthrough) devices
> 
> Is fatally flawed.  There's another backported fix for it coming:
> 
> commit 5e5ec1759dd663a1d5a2f10930224dd009e500e8
> Author: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>
> Date:   Wed Nov 9 02:59:42 2016 -0800
> 
>     scsi: megaraid_sas: fix macro MEGASAS_IS_LOGICAL to avoid
> regression
> 
> It's in a pull request now, but when it hits, could you apply both
> together to stable to avoid any stable regression issues?

Ugh, I missed that the first one went into the 4.4-stable tree, sorry
about that.  I've applied both of these to 4.8, and the second one to
4.4-stable now.

greg k-h