From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] ext4: Avoid split extents for DAX writes
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 09:54:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161114085419.GC2524@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161111202547.GA1569@linux.intel.com>
On Fri 11-11-16 13:25:47, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 12:08:12PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Currently mapping of blocks for DAX writes happen with
> > EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO flag set. That has a result that each
> > ext4_map_blocks() call creates a separate written extent, although it
> > could be merged to the neighboring extents in the extent tree. The
> > reason for using this flag is that in case the extent is unwritten, we
> > need to convert it to written one and zero it out. However this "convert
> > mapped range to written" operation is already implemented by
> > ext4_map_blocks() for the case of data writes into unwritten extent. So
> > just use flags for that mode of operation, simplify the code, and avoid
> > unnecessary split extents.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
>
> The code that this patch modifies was just introduced in the previous patch.
> Is there a reason to keep both patches, or would it be cleaner just to squash
> them and have one patch that introduces the code as you intend for it to end
> up?
Well, the previous patch just mostly moved the block allocation logic from
dedicated DAX get_block function into iomap_begin(). This patch changes the
block allocation logic so I prefer to keep them separate - mostly for the
sake of documenting the change how allocation of blocks for DAX works in the
changelog.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-14 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-08 11:08 [PATCH 0/11 v2] ext4: Convert ext4 DAX IO to iomap framework Jan Kara
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 01/11] ext4: Factor out checks from ext4_file_write_iter() Jan Kara
2016-11-10 21:25 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 02/11] ext4: Let S_DAX set only if DAX is really supported Jan Kara
2016-11-10 21:46 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-11 10:08 ` Jan Kara
2016-11-11 17:56 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 03/11] ext4: Convert DAX reads to iomap infrastructure Jan Kara
2016-11-10 21:54 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-11 10:17 ` Jan Kara
2016-11-11 17:57 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 04/11] ext4: Use iomap for zeroing blocks in DAX mode Jan Kara
2016-11-10 22:05 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 05/11] ext4: DAX iomap write support Jan Kara
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 06/11] ext4: Avoid split extents for DAX writes Jan Kara
2016-11-11 20:25 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-14 8:54 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 07/11] dax: Introduce IOMAP_FAULT flag Jan Kara
2016-11-08 23:21 ` Dave Chinner
2016-11-09 15:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 08/11] ext4: Convert DAX faults to iomap infrastructure Jan Kara
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 09/11] ext4: Rip out DAX handling from direct IO path Jan Kara
2016-11-16 17:13 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-17 9:41 ` Jan Kara
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 10/11] ext2: Use iomap_zero_range() for zeroing truncated page in DAX path Jan Kara
2016-11-16 17:31 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 11/11] dax: Rip out get_block based IO support Jan Kara
2016-11-16 18:11 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-17 9:45 ` Jan Kara
2016-11-08 23:17 ` [PATCH 0/11 v2] ext4: Convert ext4 DAX IO to iomap framework Dave Chinner
2016-11-09 15:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-09 23:22 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161114085419.GC2524@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.