Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] usb: chipidea: move the lock initialization to core file

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:02:47PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> This can fix below dump when the lock is accessed at host
> mode due to it is not initialized.
> 
> [   46.119638] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> [   46.124643] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
> [   46.130144] turning off the locking correctness validator.
> [   46.135659] CPU: 0 PID: 690 Comm: cat Not tainted 4.9.0-rc3-00079-g4b75f1d #1210
> [   46.143075] Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 SoloX (Device Tree)
> [   46.148923] Backtrace:
> [   46.151448] [<c010c460>] (dump_backtrace) from [<c010c658>] (show_stack+0x18/0x1c)
> [   46.159038]  r7:edf52000
> [   46.161412]  r6:60000193
> [   46.163967]  r5:00000000
> [   46.165035]  r4:c0e25c2c
> 
> [   46.169109] [<c010c640>] (show_stack) from [<c03f58a4>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xe8)
> [   46.176362] [<c03f57f0>] (dump_stack) from [<c016d690>] (register_lock_class+0x4fc/0x56c)
> [   46.184554]  r10:c0e25d24
> [   46.187014]  r9:edf53e70
> [   46.189569]  r8:c1642444
> [   46.190637]  r7:ee9da024
> [   46.193191]  r6:00000000
> [   46.194258]  r5:00000000
> [   46.196812]  r4:00000000
> [   46.199185]  r3:00000001
> 
> [   46.203259] [<c016d194>] (register_lock_class) from [<c0171294>] (__lock_acquire+0x80/0x10f0)
> [   46.211797]  r10:c0e25d24
> [   46.214257]  r9:edf53e70
> [   46.216813]  r8:ee9da024
> [   46.217880]  r7:c1642444
> [   46.220435]  r6:edcd1800
> [   46.221502]  r5:60000193
> [   46.224057]  r4:00000000
> 
> [   46.227953] [<c0171214>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c01726c0>] (lock_acquire+0x74/0x94)
> [   46.235710]  r10:00000001
> [   46.238169]  r9:edf53e70
> [   46.240723]  r8:edf53f80
> [   46.241790]  r7:00000001
> [   46.244344]  r6:00000001
> [   46.245412]  r5:60000193
> [   46.247966]  r4:00000000
> 
> [   46.251866] [<c017264c>] (lock_acquire) from [<c096c8fc>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x40/0x54)
> [   46.260319]  r7:ee1c6a00
> [   46.262691]  r6:c062a570
> [   46.265247]  r5:20000113
> [   46.266314]  r4:ee9da014
> 
> [   46.270393] [<c096c8bc>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c062a570>] (ci_port_test_show+0x2c/0x70)
> [   46.279280]  r6:eebd2000
> [   46.281652]  r5:ee9da010
> [   46.284207]  r4:ee9da014
> 
> [   46.286810] [<c062a544>] (ci_port_test_show) from [<c0248d04>] (seq_read+0x1ac/0x4f8)
> [   46.294655]  r9:edf53e70
> [   46.297028]  r8:edf53f80
> [   46.299583]  r7:ee1c6a00
> [   46.300650]  r6:00000001
> [   46.303205]  r5:00000000
> [   46.304273]  r4:eebd2000
> [   46.306850] [<c0248b58>] (seq_read) from [<c039e864>] (full_proxy_read+0x54/0x6c)
> [   46.314348]  r10:00000000
> [   46.316808]  r9:c0a6ad30
> [   46.319363]  r8:edf53f80
> [   46.320430]  r7:00020000
> [   46.322986]  r6:b6de3000
> [   46.324053]  r5:ee1c6a00
> [   46.326607]  r4:c0248b58
> 
> [   46.330505] [<c039e810>] (full_proxy_read) from [<c021ec98>] (__vfs_read+0x34/0x118)
> [   46.338262]  r9:edf52000
> [   46.340635]  r8:c0107fc4
> [   46.343190]  r7:00020000
> [   46.344257]  r6:edf53f80
> [   46.346812]  r5:c039e810
> [   46.347879]  r4:ee1c6a00
> [   46.350447] [<c021ec64>] (__vfs_read) from [<c021fbd0>] (vfs_read+0x8c/0x11c)
> [   46.357597]  r9:edf52000
> [   46.359969]  r8:c0107fc4
> [   46.362524]  r7:edf53f80
> [   46.363592]  r6:b6de3000
> [   46.366147]  r5:ee1c6a00
> [   46.367214]  r4:00020000
> [   46.369782] [<c021fb44>] (vfs_read) from [<c0220a4c>] (SyS_read+0x4c/0xa8)
> [   46.376672]  r8:c0107fc4
> [   46.379045]  r7:00020000
> [   46.381600]  r6:b6de3000
> [   46.382667]  r5:ee1c6a00
> [   46.385222]  r4:ee1c6a00
> 
> [   46.387817] [<c0220a00>] (SyS_read) from [<c0107e20>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c)
> [   46.395314]  r7:00000003
> [   46.397687]  r6:b6de3000
> [   46.400243]  r5:00020000
> [   46.401310]  r4:00020000
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #v4.1+

Any idea what commit caused the problem?

thanks,

greg k-h