From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/debug: Dump more detailed segfault info
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:19:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161115101903.GA15249@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161115100655.flju5ce3zxtrcyx4@pd.tnic>
* Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 07:14:47AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > So I think the line breaking artifact might be due to the following commit:
> >
> > bfd8d3f23b51 ("printk: make reading the kernel log flush pending lines")
> >
> > ... which Linus reverted upstream a few hours ago:
>
> Probably. I guess this doesn't happen when running my guest here because
> I have the segfault logging change ontop of -rc4.
Well, bfd8d3f23b51 was part of -rc1 already, so you have it too.
What might have made the difference is that I tested it on real hardware with
serial logging, which delays printk() and might have created the race with the
systemd kernel logger. (Which is impossible to turn off :-( )
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-15 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-11 10:19 [RFC PATCH] x86/debug: Dump more detailed segfault info Borislav Petkov
2016-11-12 11:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-12 12:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-13 7:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-13 11:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-13 15:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-15 6:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-15 10:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-15 10:19 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-11-15 10:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-15 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-13 16:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-11-14 6:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-17 23:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-11-18 12:38 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161115101903.GA15249@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.