From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59256) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6xpE-0003N6-KX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:52:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6xpA-0007G9-N8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:52:20 -0500 Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com ([195.59.15.196]:25392 helo=imgpgp01.kl.imgtec.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6xpA-0007FG-EA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:52:16 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:52:12 +0000 From: James Hogan Message-ID: <20161116105212.GE9443@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> References: <1478848833-25002-1-git-send-email-jinguojie@loongson.cn> <7348e0bd-9373-6219-f479-70270d03a070@twiddle.net> <09c87acc-7d56-f33b-5c31-bca88d7999e7@twiddle.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tVmo9FyGdCe4F4YN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <09c87acc-7d56-f33b-5c31-bca88d7999e7@twiddle.net> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tcg/mips: Add support for mips64el backend List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: Jin Guojie , qemu-devel , Aurelien Jarno --tVmo9FyGdCe4F4YN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Richard, On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:37:41PM +0100, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 11/14/2016 10:33 AM, Jin Guojie wrote: > > I want listen to your advice. Should I test your v2 patch on Loongson > > and use it? Or whether it is worth modifying my patch and resubmit it > > according to your review comments? >=20 > I would like very much if you would test my patch on Loongson (or a=20 > re-submission of my patch; I could perhaps prepare that against master in= the=20 > next few days). >=20 > If it is possible, I would like if you could help fix the problems that= =20 > Aurelien discovered with my patch. I have no access to mips hardware mys= elf,=20 > so all of the development that I was doing was from within a qemu itself.= As=20 > you can imagine, qemu-in-qemu is very very slow. >=20 > At the time I was hoping that people from imgtec would be able to help, b= ut=20 > that never came to pass. Oh well. I'm up for helping a bit with this (testing & debugging), though I admit it fell off my radar a bit. We could try and run it up on our kernel test farm too. Please keep me Cc'd on any future patches :) Cheers James --tVmo9FyGdCe4F4YN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYLDpcAAoJEGwLaZPeOHZ6BogP/j+VyeFUhMmV44VknTM6K0cn dt35Pz7sa0/rFK6MGBvXay8l6o7e9OeLc72Ali1UFPsxExrUSKWIADvZ/yVme0Nc ioJ0VoFb3HpPg5ZSJrkCizKrVlkLdIAb7rG6DUsLqvYAKJtXZm+0hRolHW7UgyQ1 BKMtVH2yxtzMWzB+H7rdXGIiueqeRM7qXN5iWTq15FGNI+zSNSGi/iOKWW8TZ/jU keA1xBLBiTXtnw3oT2hHQV/jKS0gcXfJqQwPkKktixgmiPfatC/GIB6+bzElN8Yl NsDY8imTcJnFyOWc7laXhrVNaCs/9e58D4DeW+rpKpA2n4XsNp8Hgn6bDEEo+a1o YTQ0IeySaWFpxWOTF6P0aNcOWwDoh4B2zJ1zQlcVNn/CpauGhlQjC1bYwDoKkdSP us3zDmFc0WwbCLF2hwYr7XmEoCHYxmx2zzDvxHGsqrF/B1UcgIgX1xeLawtF/EOQ FCOn3BDfj4f/JIxLlRIJ/fz4/IzLhzmmgiBaDwRAKO/srMXkDuEcXPG2M9YoFMLt MdVYvDgD6wGdY1TsY8sC00x11Cc1dpfNp6HT1Lsvcd1Dtc4I0vJgO9Mqvs4TbEYV bYDkVHai4ke1g0OCREiojMva94Wk+bwREVLQU3xA5sMXpcbMChgAoQvyiuYAWclE 5wGO3aW0dMDNC8YgquTA =laGo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tVmo9FyGdCe4F4YN--