All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org\" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	brouer@redhat.com"@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Netperf UDP issue with connected sockets
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:16:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161117091638.5fab8494@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479342849.8455.233.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>

On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:34:09 -0800
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 23:40 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> 
> > Using -R 1 does not seem to help remove __ip_select_ident()
> > 
> > Samples: 56K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 78628132661
> >   Overhead  Command        Shared Object        Symbol
> > +    9.11%  netperf        [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] __ip_select_ident
> > +    6.98%  netperf        [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] _raw_spin_lock
> > +    6.21%  swapper        [mlx5_core]          [k] mlx5e_poll_tx_cq
> > +    5.03%  netperf        [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] copy_user_enhanced_fast_string
> > +    4.69%  netperf        [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] __ip_make_skb
> > +    4.63%  netperf        [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] skb_set_owner_w
> > +    4.15%  swapper        [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] __slab_free
> > +    3.80%  netperf        [mlx5_core]          [k] mlx5e_sq_xmit
> > +    2.00%  swapper        [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] sock_wfree
> > +    1.94%  netperf        netperf              [.] send_data
> > +    1.92%  netperf        netperf              [.] send_omni_inner  
> 
> Check "ss -nu"  ?
> 
> You will see if sockets are connected (present in ss output or not)

Tested different versions of netperf, commands used below signature:

 netperf-2.6.0: connected "broken"
 netperf-2.7.0: connected works
 SVN-r709     : connected works

I noticed there is a Send-Q, and the perf-top2 is _raw_spin_lock, which
looks like it comes from __dev_queue_xmit(), but we know from
experience that this stall is actually caused by writing the
tailptr/doorbell in the HW.  Thus, this could benefit a lot from
bulk/xmit_more into the qdisc layer.


> UDP being connected does not prevent __ip_select_ident() being used.
> 
>     if ((iph->frag_off & htons(IP_DF)) && !skb->ignore_df) {
> 
> So you need IP_DF being set, and skb->ignore_df being 0

Thanks for explaining that! :-)

http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/net/ip.h?v=4.8#L332
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/ipv4/ip_output.c?v=4.8#L449

Netperf UDP_STREAM default send 64K packets that get fragmented...
which actually is very unfortunate because people end-up testing a code
path in the kernel they didn't expect.  That is why I use the
option "-- -m 1472".


> time to try IP_MTU_DISCOVER ;)  

To Rick, maybe you can find a good solution or option with Eric's hint,
to send appropriate sized UDP packets with Don't Fragment (DF).

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

Testing with ss -nua

$ /usr/local/stow/netperf-2.6.0-demo/bin/netperf -H 198.18.50.1 -t UDP_STREAM -l 3 -- -m 1472 -n -N > /dev/null & sleep 1; ss -una

State      Recv-Q Send-Q       Local Address:Port          Peer Address:Port
UNCONN     0      11520                    *:54589                    *:*

$ /usr/local/stow/netperf-2.7.0-demo/bin/netperf -H 198.18.50.1 -t UDP_STREAM -l 3 -- -m 1472 -n -N > /dev/null & sleep 1; ss -una
State      Recv-Q Send-Q       Local Address:Port          Peer Address:Port
ESTAB      0      18432          198.18.50.3:46803          198.18.50.1:51851

$ ~/tools/netperf2-svn/src/netperf -H 198.18.50.1 -t UDP_STREAM -l 3 -- -m 1472 -n -N > /dev/null & sleep 1; ss -una
State      Recv-Q Send-Q       Local Address:Port          Peer Address:Port
ESTAB      0      43776          198.18.50.3:42965          198.18.50.1:51948

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-17  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-03 14:59 High perf top ip_idents_reserve doing netperf UDP_STREAM Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-03 15:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-16 12:16   ` Netperf UDP issue with connected sockets Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-16 17:46     ` Rick Jones
2016-11-16 22:40       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-16 22:50         ` Rick Jones
2016-11-17  0:34         ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-17  8:16           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2016-11-17 13:20             ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-17 13:42               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-17 14:17                 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-17 14:57                   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-17 16:21                     ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-17 18:30                       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-17 18:51                         ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-17 21:19                           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-17 21:44                             ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-17 23:08                               ` Rick Jones
2016-11-18  0:37                                 ` Julian Anastasov
2016-11-18  0:42                                   ` Rick Jones
2016-11-18 17:12                               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-21 16:03                           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-21 18:10                             ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-29  6:58                               ` [WIP] net+mlx4: auto doorbell Eric Dumazet
2016-11-30 11:38                                 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-30 15:56                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-30 19:17                                     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-30 19:30                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-30 22:30                                         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-30 22:40                                           ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-01  0:27                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-01  1:16                                           ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-01  2:32                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-01  2:50                                               ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-02 18:16                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-01  5:03                                               ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-01 19:24                                                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2016-11-30 13:50                                 ` Saeed Mahameed
2016-11-30 15:44                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-30 16:27                                     ` Saeed Mahameed
2016-11-30 17:28                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-01 12:05                                       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-12-01 14:24                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-01 16:04                                           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-12-01 17:04                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-01 19:17                                               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-12-01 20:11                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-01 20:20                                               ` David Miller
2016-12-01 22:10                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-02 14:23                                               ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-01 21:32                                 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-12-01 22:04                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-17 17:34                     ` Netperf UDP issue with connected sockets David Laight
2016-11-17 22:39                       ` Alexander Duyck
2016-11-17 17:42             ` Rick Jones
2016-11-28 18:33             ` Rick Jones
2016-11-28 18:40               ` Rick Jones
2016-11-30 10:43               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-30 17:42                 ` Rick Jones
2016-11-30 18:11                   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161117091638.5fab8494@redhat.com \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc="netdev@vger.kernel.org\" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, brouer@redhat.com"@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=rick.jones2@hpe.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.