Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: cppi41: More PM runtime fixes

[Vinod Koul <vinod.koul-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:24:15AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Fix use of u32 instead of int for checking for negative errors values
> as pointed out by Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>.
> 
> And while testing the PM runtime error path by randomly returning
> failed values in runtime resume, I noticed two more places that need
> fixing:
> 
> - If pm_runtime_get_sync() fails in probe, we still need to do
>   pm_runtime_put_sync() to keep the use count happy. We could call
>   pm_runtime_put_noidle() on the error path, but we're just going
>   to call pm_runtime_disable() after that so pm_runtime_put_sync()
>   will do what we want
> 
> - We should print an error if pm_runtime_get_sync() fails in
>   cppi41_dma_alloc_chan_resources() so we know where it happens

Applied now. Would have been ideal if the patches were split per fix

Thanks
-- 
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html