Re: [PATCH] crec: Correct name of output binary to crec

[Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>]

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:13:10AM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> > This part I agree. Unfortunately this was not done transparently...
> > 
> > > b) the source file should have been renamed to match, if the name "crec"
> > > is a massive problem then it should also be a problem that
> > > "cplay.c->cplay" but "crec.c->crecord". If it's ok to have the source
> > > file called crec.c what's wrong with the binary it builds being called
> > > crec?
> > 
> > I dont mind renaming source as well..
> > 
> > I think bigger question is should we continue crec or crecord, my preference
> > is latter.
> > 
> > > c) it's a nuisance to have to change existing test systems and apps that
> > > launch "crec", or to create symlinks from crec->crecord.
> > 
> > Yeah agree, lets decide on one and stick to that, forever hopefully :)
> > 
> 
> Ok let's change to crecord for consistency with arecord, and I'll do a
> patch to rename the source to match.

Sounds good :)

-- 
~Vinod