From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com ([209.85.192.193]:33741 "EHLO mail-pf0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752820AbcKSBuc (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2016 20:50:32 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f193.google.com with SMTP id 144so14449823pfv.0 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:50:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:43:27 -0800 From: Olof Johansson To: Simon Horman Cc: arm@kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Magnus Damm Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Renesas ARM Based SoC EtherAVB Updates for v4.10 Message-ID: <20161119014327.GD2543@localhost> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 03:05:08PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > > Please consider these Renesas ARM based SoC EtherAVB updates for v4.10. > > This pull request is based on the "Second Round of Renesas ARM64 Based SoC > DT Updates for v4.10", tagged as arm64-dt-for-v4.10, which I have also sent > a pull-request for. > > The reason for this base is to provide dependencies. For the same reason > an ack has been provided by David Miller to facilitate a merge of the patch > via the Renesas tree. And now we have cascading dependencies. Can't merge this either. Why is the DT branch and this driver branch entangled?! Again, there is absolutely no functional dependency between them. -Olof From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:43:27 -0800 Subject: [GIT PULL] Renesas ARM Based SoC EtherAVB Updates for v4.10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20161119014327.GD2543@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 03:05:08PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > > Please consider these Renesas ARM based SoC EtherAVB updates for v4.10. > > This pull request is based on the "Second Round of Renesas ARM64 Based SoC > DT Updates for v4.10", tagged as arm64-dt-for-v4.10, which I have also sent > a pull-request for. > > The reason for this base is to provide dependencies. For the same reason > an ack has been provided by David Miller to facilitate a merge of the patch > via the Renesas tree. And now we have cascading dependencies. Can't merge this either. Why is the DT branch and this driver branch entangled?! Again, there is absolutely no functional dependency between them. -Olof