Re: [PATCH v5] USB hub_probe: rework ugly goto-into-compound-statement

[Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@gmail.com>]

> Ok, I'm going to be really pedantic here and ask that you spell this
> last statement out:
>        if (usb...)
>                 return true;
>        return false;


> 
> Also, the comment should say:
> 	/* If the first endpoint is not interrupt IN, we... */
> 

It's better to inverse the condition and return false:

```
if (!usb...)
        return false;
return true;
```

This is exactly what is said in the comment ("If the first endpoint...
we'd better punt!"). And does not break the composition of the entire
function (all `if` bodies return false, last statement is `return
true`).

-- 
Eugene