From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753311AbcKUJC2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2016 04:02:28 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:45260 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753003AbcKUJC0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2016 04:02:26 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:02:23 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Boqun Feng Cc: "Reshetova, Elena" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "keescook@chromium.org" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "mingo@kernel.org" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "dave@progbits.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] kref: Implement using refcount_t Message-ID: <20161121090223.GE3102@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20161114173946.501528675@infradead.org> <20161114174446.832175072@infradead.org> <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612B41C148C4@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> <20161118113718.GP3117@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20161121084428.GG5227@tardis.cn.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161121084428.GG5227@tardis.cn.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 04:44:28PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:37:18PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > [snip] > > + > > +/* > > + * Similar to atomic_inc(), will saturate at UINT_MAX and WARN. > > + * > > + * Provides no memory ordering, it is assumed the caller already has a > > + * reference on the object, will WARN when this is not so. > > + */ > > +static inline void refcount_inc(refcount_t *r) > > +{ > > + unsigned int old, new, val = atomic_read(&r->refs); > > + > > + for (;;) { > > + WARN(!val, "refcount_t: increment on 0; use-after-free.\n"); > > + > > Do we want to put the address of @r into the WARN information? Which > could help us locate the problematic object quickly. I explicitly didn't do that because printing kernel addresses is generally frowned upon. Also, random heap addresses are just that, random. In most cases the backtrace is more informative.