All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Cathy Luo <cluo@marvell.com>,
	Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@marvell.com>,
	rajatja@google.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com,
	Xinming Hu <huxm@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] mwifiex: wait firmware dump complete during card remove process
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 09:36:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161121173602.GA147125@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479301749-14803-4-git-send-email-akarwar@marvell.com>

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:39:08PM +0530, Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
> From: Xinming Hu <huxm@marvell.com>
> 
> Wait for firmware dump complete in card remove function.
> For sdio interface, there are two diffenrent cases,
> card reset trigger sdio_work and firmware dump trigger sdio_work.
> Do code rearrangement for distinguish between these two cases.

On second review of the SDIO card reset code (which I'll repeat is quite
ugly), you seem to be making a bad distinction here. What if there is a
firmware dump happening concurrently with your card-reset handling? You
*do* want to synchronize with the firmware dump before completing the
card reset, or else you might be freeing up internal card resources that
are still in use. See below.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Xinming Hu <huxm@marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>
> ---
> v2: 1. Get rid of reset_triggered flag. Instead split the code and use
>     __mwifiex_sdio_remove() (Brian Norris/Dmitry Torokhov)
>     2. "v1 4/5 mwifiex: firmware dump code rearrangement.." is dropped. So
>     rebased accordingly.
> v3: same as [v2,5/5]. The improvement of 'moving pcie_work to card struct'
> suggested by Brian is taken care in next patch.
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c |  6 +++++-
>  drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c
> index dd8f7aa..c8e69a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ static int mwifiex_pcie_probe_of(struct device *dev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void mwifiex_pcie_work(struct work_struct *work);
> +static DECLARE_WORK(pcie_work, mwifiex_pcie_work);
> +
>  static int
>  mwifiex_map_pci_memory(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  		       size_t size, int flags)
> @@ -254,6 +257,8 @@ static void mwifiex_pcie_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	if (!adapter || !adapter->priv_num)
>  		return;
>  
> +	cancel_work_sync(&pcie_work);
> +
>  	if (user_rmmod && !adapter->mfg_mode) {
>  		mwifiex_deauthenticate_all(adapter);
>  
> @@ -2722,7 +2727,6 @@ static void mwifiex_pcie_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  		mwifiex_pcie_device_dump_work(save_adapter);
>  }
>  
> -static DECLARE_WORK(pcie_work, mwifiex_pcie_work);
>  /* This function dumps FW information */
>  static void mwifiex_pcie_device_dump(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c
> index 16d1d30..78f2cc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@
>   */
>  static u8 user_rmmod;
>  
> +static void mwifiex_sdio_work(struct work_struct *work);
> +static DECLARE_WORK(sdio_work, mwifiex_sdio_work);
> +
>  static struct mwifiex_if_ops sdio_ops;
>  static unsigned long iface_work_flags;
>  
> @@ -220,7 +223,7 @@ static int mwifiex_sdio_resume(struct device *dev)
>   * This function removes the interface and frees up the card structure.
>   */
>  static void
> -mwifiex_sdio_remove(struct sdio_func *func)
> +__mwifiex_sdio_remove(struct sdio_func *func)
>  {
>  	struct sdio_mmc_card *card;
>  	struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter;
> @@ -249,6 +252,13 @@ static int mwifiex_sdio_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	mwifiex_remove_card(adapter);
>  }
>  
> +static void
> +mwifiex_sdio_remove(struct sdio_func *func)
> +{
> +	cancel_work_sync(&sdio_work);
> +	__mwifiex_sdio_remove(func);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * SDIO suspend.
>   *
> @@ -2227,7 +2237,7 @@ static void mwifiex_recreate_adapter(struct sdio_mmc_card *card)
>  	 * discovered and initializes them from scratch.
>  	 */
>  
> -	mwifiex_sdio_remove(func);
> +	__mwifiex_sdio_remove(func);

^^ So here, you're trying to avoid syncing with the card-reset work
event, except that function will free up all your resources (including
the static save_adapter). Thus, you're explicitly allowing a
use-after-free error here. That seems unwise.

Instead, you should actually retain the invariant that you're doing a
full remove/reinitialize here, which includes doing the *same*
cancel_work_sync() here in mwifiex_recreate_adapter() as you would in
any other remove().

IOW, kill the __mwifiex_sdio_remove() and just call
mwifiex_sdio_remove() as you were.

That also means that you can do the same per-adapter cleanup in the
following patch as you do for PCIe.

Brian

>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Normally, we would let the driver core take care of releasing these.
> @@ -2568,7 +2578,6 @@ static void mwifiex_sdio_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  		mwifiex_sdio_card_reset_work(save_adapter);
>  }
>  
> -static DECLARE_WORK(sdio_work, mwifiex_sdio_work);
>  /* This function resets the card */
>  static void mwifiex_sdio_card_reset(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
>  {
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-21 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-16 13:09 [PATCH v3 1/5] mwifiex: don't wait for main_process in shutdown_drv Amitkumar Karwar
2016-11-16 13:09 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mwifiex: do not free firmware dump memory " Amitkumar Karwar
2016-11-16 13:09 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] mwifiex: get rid of drv_info* adapter variables Amitkumar Karwar
2016-11-16 13:09 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] mwifiex: wait firmware dump complete during card remove process Amitkumar Karwar
2016-11-16 19:01   ` Brian Norris
2016-11-21 17:36   ` Brian Norris [this message]
2016-11-24 12:14     ` Amitkumar Karwar
2016-11-28 21:27       ` Brian Norris
2016-11-30 12:39         ` Amitkumar Karwar
2016-11-30 18:33           ` Brian Norris
2016-12-01 14:02             ` Amitkumar Karwar
2017-01-04  2:12               ` Brian Norris
2016-11-16 13:09 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] mwifiex: move pcie_work and related variables inside card Amitkumar Karwar
2017-01-12 14:45 ` [v3,1/5] mwifiex: don't wait for main_process in shutdown_drv Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161121173602.GA147125@google.com \
    --to=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=akarwar@marvell.com \
    --cc=cluo@marvell.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=huxm@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nishants@marvell.com \
    --cc=rajatja@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.