From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] btrfs: calculate end of bio offset properly
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:42:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161122094240.GA15407@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161118200438.GF19038@vader.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:04:38PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > +static u64 bio_end_offset(struct bio *bio)
> > +{
> > + struct bio_vec *last = &bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt - 1];
> > +
> > + return page_offset(last->bv_page) + last->bv_len - last->bv_offset;
>
> Why is this minus bv_offset and not plus? Am I misunderstanding
> bv_offset?
This should be a plus, thanks.
Can anyone help me on how to get test coverage for the compression
code?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-22 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-16 12:52 don't poke into bio internals Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-16 12:52 ` [PATCH 1/9] btrfs: use bio iterators for the decompression handlers Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-19 1:29 ` Liu Bo
2016-11-22 9:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-22 20:32 ` Liu Bo
2016-11-16 12:52 ` [PATCH 2/9] btrfs: don't access the bio directly in the raid5/6 code Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-18 19:05 ` Omar Sandoval
2016-11-16 12:52 ` [PATCH 3/9] " Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-18 19:34 ` Omar Sandoval
2016-11-16 12:52 ` [PATCH 4/9] btrfs: don't access the bio directly in btrfs_csum_one_bio Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-18 19:39 ` Omar Sandoval
2016-11-16 12:52 ` [PATCH 5/9] btrfs: use bi_size Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-18 19:48 ` Omar Sandoval
2016-11-16 12:52 ` [PATCH 6/9] btrfs: calculate end of bio offset properly Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-18 20:04 ` Omar Sandoval
2016-11-22 9:42 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-11-22 18:58 ` Omar Sandoval
2016-11-23 4:21 ` Anand Jain
2016-11-23 4:21 ` Omar Sandoval
2016-11-23 4:32 ` Anand Jain
2016-11-23 4:47 ` Omar Sandoval
2016-11-16 12:52 ` [PATCH 7/9] btrfs: refactor __btrfs_lookup_bio_sums to use bio_for_each_segment_all Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-18 20:31 ` Omar Sandoval
2016-11-16 12:52 ` [PATCH 8/9] btrfs: use bio_for_each_segment_all in __btrfsic_submit_bio Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-18 20:36 ` Omar Sandoval
2016-11-16 12:52 ` [PATCH 9/9] btrfs: only check bio size to see if a repair bio should have the failfast flag Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-16 16:19 ` don't poke into bio internals David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161122094240.GA15407@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.