From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41270 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934274AbcKWKbG (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2016 05:31:06 -0500 Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:31:00 +0100 From: David Sterba To: Anand Jain Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Make btrfs-progs really compatible with any kernel version Message-ID: <20161123103100.GP12522@suse.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz References: <1448283378-10579-1-git-send-email-anand.jain@oracle.com> <824aa945-fd1f-45a2-9123-2bd810f464d6@oracle.com> <20161114121335.GJ12522@suse.cz> <426cb2c7-b947-63d1-a8c4-8a575268377f@oracle.com> <20161122131631.GM12522@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:00:49AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > > Preparatory bits are in patches: > > > > btrfs-progs: mkfs: add names of matching sysfs feature names > > btrfs-progs: mkfs: enhance feature table > > btrfs-progs: mkfs: extend mkfs features with compat, safe and default versions > > I don't seen these patches in the ML. Looks like it was integrated > in 4.8.3. Yeah the patches and many other from me haven't been sent to the mailinglist, unless I need input regarding usecase. Sending everything would increase work for me and most of the patches are boring cleanups anyway. > > the core work is not yet done. > > > > The original usecase has been extended to allow for selecting features > > that are compatible, ie. can be mounted, safe, ie. are ok wrt The > > Status page, and default, ie. automatically selected by mkfs. > > > Additionally to > > that, a system-wide preset from a config file in /etc. > > > Certainly these patches could have been on (cleanup/enhancement) > top of my patches which was sent a year back. Well, back then I started on top of your patches and found out that I'd have to rework too much code so it was easier to start from scratch.